This week's book giveaway is in the Agile and other Processes forum. We're giving away four copies of The Mikado Method and have Ola Ellnestam and Daniel Brolund on-line! See this thread for details.
Can someone advise me if RMI or EJB is better for Finance Professionals from an implementation point of view? Vishal, New Delhi, India.
Nakul Kasadwala
Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 30, 2000
Posts: 22
posted
0
Hi Vishal If u are implementinf Financial application , you can go for EJB. Reason is that EJB server provides many serices which will be helpful in Financial application.for e.g. Transaction Support Nakul
Nakul Kasadwala
Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 30, 2000
Posts: 22
posted
0
Hi Vishal If u are implementing Financial application , you can go for EJB. Reason is that EJB server provides many serices which will be helpful in Financial application.for e.g. Transaction Support Nakul
Aleksey Matiychenko
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 03, 2001
Posts: 178
posted
0
I agree that EJB may be better because it has a lot of bultin functionalities such as transaction support , connection pulling etc. Underneath EJB there is still an RMI/IIOP layer. The disadvantages of EJBs are that 1. You need a server and the good ones are not cheap. 2. Though there is a standard spec different vendors implement things differently and you might be tying yourself to one particular vendor.
Fred Abbot
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 01, 2000
Posts: 300
posted
0
I developed an application using EJBS but since the servers are so expensive and we dont really need EJBs right now I switched to RMI for production and when changes are made i make it to both the EJB and RMI version so when we have to switch to EJBs I will be ready
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to
run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.
0
