Can someone advise me if RMI or EJB is better for Finance Professionals from an implementation point of view? Vishal, New Delhi, India.
Nakul Kasadwala
Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 30, 2000
Posts: 22
posted
0
Hi Vishal If u are implementinf Financial application , you can go for EJB. Reason is that EJB server provides many serices which will be helpful in Financial application.for e.g. Transaction Support Nakul
Nakul Kasadwala
Greenhorn
Joined: Oct 30, 2000
Posts: 22
posted
0
Hi Vishal If u are implementing Financial application , you can go for EJB. Reason is that EJB server provides many serices which will be helpful in Financial application.for e.g. Transaction Support Nakul
Aleksey Matiychenko
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 03, 2001
Posts: 178
posted
0
I agree that EJB may be better because it has a lot of bultin functionalities such as transaction support , connection pulling etc. Underneath EJB there is still an RMI/IIOP layer. The disadvantages of EJBs are that 1. You need a server and the good ones are not cheap. 2. Though there is a standard spec different vendors implement things differently and you might be tying yourself to one particular vendor.
Fred Abbot
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 01, 2000
Posts: 300
posted
0
I developed an application using EJBS but since the servers are so expensive and we dont really need EJBs right now I switched to RMI for production and when changes are made i make it to both the EJB and RMI version so when we have to switch to EJBs I will be ready
0
