wood burning stoves 2.0*
The moose likes Object Relational Mapping and the fly likes Ballot results for JSR #243 (JDO 2.0) Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Java 8 in Action this week in the Java 8 forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Databases » Object Relational Mapping
Bookmark "Ballot results for JSR #243 (JDO 2.0)" Watch "Ballot results for JSR #243 (JDO 2.0)" New topic
Author

Ballot results for JSR #243 (JDO 2.0)

Kris Schneider
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 14, 2001
Posts: 71
Thought this might be of interest. I doubt the general Java community will be too happy with the votes from Oracle, BEA, and IBM. Basically, they all voted no due to perceived overlap with EJB.
Darren Bell
Greenhorn

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 14
This also may have something to do with the fact that IBM and BEA have jointly put forward a recommendation called SDO (Service Data Objects). Have a look on developerWorks.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Ballot results for JSR #243 (JDO 2.0)
 
Similar Threads
Vote for your favorite bartender and sherif
Vote for JavaRanch!
SUV or minivan
WA #1.....word association
'Value Added' JR service: Make fun of this name