| Author |
Hibernate: is it necessary to have primary key in table
|
amit sharma
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 19, 2006
Posts: 129
|
|
|
I am new to hibernate .I want to know is it necessary to have primary key in table.I real life there are many tables which not has primary key .
|
 |
Jaikiran Pai
Saloon Keeper
Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 6718
|
|
Discussed many times before. A couple of similar posts: Mapping a table without a primary key No primary key in database
|
[My Blog] [JavaRanch Journal]
|
 |
Paul Sturrock
Bartender
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 10336
|
|
Hibernate is a Object-Relational Mapping tool. Any data in a database that does not have a primary key is not relational data, since it can't reliably participate in any relationships without a guarenteed identifier. Entity Relational models that contain entities without a defined primary key are, in my opinion, most probably broken. I say most probably, since there are the odd occasions where you may need to store non-relational data in a database for some other reason. For example, if the database is your only shared, transactional resource it could be use as a simple persistance resource, rather than a truely relational store. However, these situations are very much the exception, not the rule, and Hibernate includes ways round most situations. Where it doesn't, if you are using it with a pattern like DAO its easy enough to delegate to whatever mechanism you use to manage non-relational data.
|
JavaRanch FAQ HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Hibernate: is it necessary to have primary key in table
|
|
|