The moose likes Web Services and the fly likes Web Services standards/specifications tracking Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Web Services
Reply Bookmark "Web Services standards/specifications tracking" Watch "Web Services standards/specifications tracking" New topic
Author

Web Services standards/specifications tracking

James Jordan II
Greenhorn

Joined: Aug 24, 2005
Posts: 6
Does anyone know of a link/article/Web page listing all the Web Services specifications and standards?

It's getting very hard to keep track of which ones are must-have requirements (like WSDL, SOAP) and which are not widely supported.

For example, and only an example, it's hard to know the vendor support status of SDO - Service Data Objects.
Luis Canizares
Greenhorn

Joined: Mar 12, 2005
Posts: 12
Hi friend

I was working with Web Services stuff and some standards can be gotten at


http://www.oasis-open.org/home/index.php

http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/

I hope it will be helpful

Luis
Quito, Ecuador
James Jordan II
Greenhorn

Joined: Aug 24, 2005
Posts: 6
Sorry if I was not clear. I'm not looking for the specs, I'm looking for reviews/commentary/opinions on the progress made on the specs. Politics, market penentration, and discussions on strengths/weaknesses.

For example, how many vendors are supporting what specs, which specs are loosing market support, what's hot, etc.
Tim West
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Posts: 539
I've not yet found a comprehensive site for this...and I have looked! A great article is The History of Web Services, though it's a little out of date. I emailed the author and asked him if he was aware of an updated article or information source and he was not.

As far as learning what standards are hot/popular, it comes down to personal judgement and experience. It's hard to come up with general rules, even. E.g., just because a standard is by the W3C doesn't mean it's generally accepted and will be used. The same goes for consortia like OASIS. For example, OASIS has backed two (sets of) transaction standards (BTP and WS-CAF), but another set (WS-Coordination, WS-AtomicTransaction, WS-BusinessActivity), written by IBM, Microsoft and BEA appears to be gaining more ground in terms of useability.

I reckon It's fair to say that the Basic Profile is accepted by everyone. Beyond that, though, it gets tough. WS-Addressing, the Basic Security Profile and the WS-Policy standards appear to be heading for common acceptance, but this is only a hunch of mine.


-Tim
 
 
subject: Web Services standards/specifications tracking
 
Threads others viewed
Informal poll - Web Services Certification
Informal Web Services Poll
Difference between JBI &J2EE
Next Generation of Web Services
SCDJWS relevant for Websphere and/or Aqualogic developers?
developer file tools