This week's giveaway is in the Spring forum.
We're giving away four copies of REST with Spring (video course) and have Eugen Paraschiv on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Threads and Synchronization and the fly likes Synchronized method behavior Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of REST with Spring (video course) this week in the Spring forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Threads and Synchronization
Bookmark "Synchronized method behavior" Watch "Synchronized method behavior" New topic

Synchronized method behavior

Yuan Ye
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Posts: 172
HI, I got question about the synchronized method.
class A {
synchronized void m1() {
synchronized void m2() {
supposing two threads t1 and t2 have the same instance of A (a). t1 is calling a.m1() and t2 is calling a.m2().
My question is what would the behavior of t2 like when it calls m2 method and can't get the lock. Would t2 be suspended, or would t2 try to call m2 again later? Notice there's nothing of wait() or notify() in the synchronized method.
Ernest Friedman-Hill
author and iconoclast

Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 24195

t2 would just pause until the lock became available. "suspended" has a specific technical meaning in Java, so you can't really say it's suspended, but yes, that's what it is.

[Jess in Action][AskingGoodQuestions]
Yuan Ye
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 05, 2003
Posts: 172
Thanks for replying.
So does that mean the JVM will take care of the business, it will check the available of the lock for t2 and I don't need write anything like wait() or notify() in this case, is that right?
Jim Yingst

Joined: Jan 30, 2000
Posts: 18671

"I'm not back." - Bill Harding, Twister
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Synchronized method behavior
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition