In the above code, the synchronized method a(), when executed, obtains a lock on it's own object. It then calls synchronized method b() which also needs to acquire a lock on it's own object. If Java did not allow a thread to reacquire it's own lock method b() would be unable to proceed until method a() completed and released the lock; and method a() would be unable to complete until method b() completed. Result: deadlock
Is it deadlock? [ October 30, 2007: Message edited by: Jim Yingst ]
Joined: Jan 30, 2000
Did you try running it? If the methods complete and the JVM exits, that's a clue that it's not deadlock.
Java synchronization is reentrant. Deadlock will only occur when you're talking about locks on two or more different monitor objects.
I edited your post to move the discussion out of the code block - the lines were too long, and messed up the formatting of the page. (Inside code blocks, line breaks will not be inserted automatically.)