Hi all' int index=1; String a[]=new String(5); String b=a[index];//1 S.o.p(b); It prints null but i thought there will be a compiler error at line 1 b is not of the type [] Thanks in advance Neha
nss
Fei Ng
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 26, 2000
Posts: 1241
posted
0
Originally posted by Neha Sawant: Hi all' int index=1; String a[]=new String(5); String b=a[index];//1 S.o.p(b); It prints null but i thought there will be a compiler error at line 1 b is not of the type [] Thanks in advance Neha
Maybe i don't understand your question, buy anyway... String b=a[index];//1 String assign to a String, nothing wrong with line one //1. a[index] is a String Object. And b is a String reference. So, b has null now. I think it works ok.
Jane Griscti
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 30, 2000
Posts: 3141
posted
0
Hi Neha, <code> String a[]=new String(5); </code> Here you are declaring a String array a[] and initializing it to hold 5 String objects. The default value of all objects, including String objects, is null. So a[0] points to a 'null' object, a[1] points to a 'null' object, etc. Hope that helps. ------------------ Jane Griscti Sun Certified Programmer for the Java� 2 Platform Co-author Mike Meyers' Java 2 Certification Passport [This message has been edited by Jane Griscti (edited December 02, 2001).]
thanx Feing and Jane. I was under the impression that a being of type array[] how it can be assigned to a plain string type. But after Jane's explanation i realised that it is not the entire [] that is assigned but just a[1] that is assigned to string b. Thanx once again Neha.
Uma Viswanathan
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 14, 2001
Posts: 126
posted
0
A minute one to note: String a[]=new String(5); Will give compiler error.
Tony Sam
Ranch Hand
Joined: Nov 19, 2001
Posts: 32
posted
0
Originally posted by Uma Viswanathan: A minute one to note: String a[]=new String(5); Will give compiler error.
Of course,it may be String a[]=new String[5],but as you know ,it's not the main point
Tony Sam<BR>One want to be a SCJP...
Uma Viswanathan
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 14, 2001
Posts: 126
posted
0
Hey...that's why without touching the main subject, just pointed out...
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to
run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.