jQuery in Action, 3rd edition
The moose likes Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP) and the fly likes JQ+->Threads-->waitForAll() Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP)
Bookmark "JQ+->Threads-->waitForAll()" Watch "JQ+->Threads-->waitForAll()" New topic


Vikrama Sanjeeva
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 02, 2001
Posts: 756
OH!.I never ever heard about this method before in my life.... waitForAll()
Here is the question.
Question ID :958269346510
Which of the following may pause/stop the current thread?
1:calling Thread.yield()
2:calling stop() on an object of class Thread
3:calling someObject.wait()
4:calling someObj.notify()
5:calling waitForAll on MediaTracker Object
Correct Answer are 1,2,3 & 5.
A/C to me 1: is correct, since it is not must that the thread which has called yield will leave Running state.
2:is obviously correct,will stop the calling Thread.
3:The calling Thread will must leave the running state & move to waiting state(in this case monitor is also release)
4:wait(),notify() & notifyAll() are always called on Threads rather than Objects.
5: Viki.waitForAllRanchers()???

Count the flowers of ur garden,NOT the leafs which falls away!

Count the flowers of your garden, NOT the leafs which falls away!
Prepare IBM Exam 340 by joining http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IBM340Exam/
Rashmi Tambe
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Posts: 418
Three is no such method like waitForAll(). And That's for sure!!! Either the answers are wrong or you r having older version of JQ+
Jose Botella
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 03, 2001
Posts: 2120
Why calling aThread.stop() would stop other thread than aThread ? I don't think 2 is ok.
According to API MediaTracker.waitForAll waits untill all the images are loaded.

SCJP2. Please Indent your code using UBB Code
Jim Hall
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 29, 2001
Posts: 162
Originally posted by Rashmi Gunjotikar:
Three is no such method like [b]waitForAll(). And That's for sure!!! Either the answers are wrong or you r having older version of JQ+

You really should check the API before making a statement like that, because it does exist.
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: JQ+->Threads-->waitForAll()
It's not a secret anymore!