This week's book giveaway is in the Agile and other Processes forum. We're giving away four copies of The Mikado Method and have Ola Ellnestam and Daniel Brolund on-line! See this thread for details.
Could someone please explain, why the answer is [100][] ? I think it should be[100][100] as the parameters for the methods are Object. Thanks, Arun
Valentin Crettaz
Gold Digger
Sheriff
Joined: Aug 26, 2001
Posts: 7610
posted
0
Even objects are passed by value. In this case, the reference (not the whole stack object) s1 and s2 are copied and passed to the method processStacks. Inside the method, if you change the reference (x2=x1) then the change is not reported outside the method because the reference were copied... That is, outside the method, s1 and s2 will still refer to their initial stack. (Imagine the nightmare it would be to find a bug if reference passing was allowed in Java. I find it much more better that way, but it's a matter of personal taste, of course.) HIH
Thanks Valentin, Could you please explain me how we can differentiate whether the parameter is whole object or reference ? Arun
Valentin Crettaz
Gold Digger
Sheriff
Joined: Aug 26, 2001
Posts: 7610
posted
0
"whole" objects are never passed as parameters only (a copy of) the reference to the object is passed. There is an interesting document about that: Javaranch: pass-by-Value Please HIH [ January 22, 2002: Message edited by: Valentin Crettaz ]
Arun Mishra
Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 02, 2002
Posts: 16
posted
0
Thanks Valentin
mark stone
Ranch Hand
Joined: Dec 18, 2001
Posts: 417
posted
0
need some qustions or code to practice this. can you send me some links or resources ?
Originally posted by Valentin Crettaz: "whole" objects are never passed as parameters only (a copy of) the reference to the object is passed. There is an interesting document about that: Javaranch :-P ass-by-Value Please HIH