The question from Exam cram states In the following code which defines the class BigWidget as extending Widget, the XXXXXX stands for an access modifier for the method setWidth.
Which of the following modifiers, used in line 4 instead of XXXXXX would allow the BigWidget class to access the setWidth method (as in line 10) but prevent unrelated classes in other packages from calling setWidth? a. private b. protected c. blank - i.e., the method declaration would read void setWidth(int n) I chose b. But, the books says the answer is b and c. I chose b because of the word "unrelated." I assumed that a subclass of Widget would be "related" whether they were in the same package or not and therefore should have access to the setWidth method. Is this just one of those cases where the question is worded improperly or am I missing something? Thanks in advance for your help.
Hope This Helps
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
The statement, "unrelated classes in other packages..." means classes that are not subclass of (in this cas class Widget). Here are the basic rules: 1. All classes in the same package will be able to access a method with a 'default' access modifier (one where you don't declare any). 2. The protected access modifier is less restrictive that the 'default access modifier, since it ALSO allow access to methods declared with the 'protected' access modifier. [ March 06, 2002: Message edited by: Rajinder Yadav ]
<a href="http://www.rajindery.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Rajinder Yadav</a><p>Each problem that I solved became a rule which served afterwards to solve other problems. --Rene Descartes
Joined: Mar 02, 2002
hi, I think the answers r both b and c. The way i understand the question it says which access specifiers "prevent unrelated classes in other packages from calling setWidth".(the important thing to keep in mind is the other packages part)
I think the confusion is with the way the question is framed, anyway... Here there r 2 things (related/unrelated) and (same package/other package) and i'am asssuming related classes to be subclasses of Widget and same package to be default package(since no package statement is specified) Now.... if XXXX is declared as protected, "unrelated classes in other packages cannot access setWidth"....... true b is correct. if XXXX is blank(default access), even here "unrelated classes in other packages cannot access setWidth"....... true c is correct. hope this helps correct me if i'am wrong Anil
Joined: Dec 04, 2001
Anil, Your thought process is excellent. I didn't think about it that way. It helped alot.