This week's book giveaway is in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum. We're giving away four copies of Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt and have Girish Suryanarayana, Ganesh Samarthyam & Tushar Sharma on-line! See this thread for details.
Hi, In theory I understand the way Threads join() method works, but when I am testing it with some code, I am getting unexpected results. I thought if you say: 1. start a thread1 2. start a thread2 3 do thread2.join() I thought the result would be thread1 will pause until thread2 finishes then go back to runnable and eventually finish. Here's my code with an exlanation of results:
No matter how I change the for loop counter int in run(), Fred always finishes before Lucy. Surely he has joined the end of Lucy and must wait till she finishes. Thanx for any help
What you have stated about the join() method is exactly right. The analysis of your code can be done as follows: There are 3 threads running namely, 1>main thread 2>Fred thread 3>Lucy thread The code starts the threads "Fred" and "Lucy" in the "main" thread. Therefore,we call the join() method on the "main" thread and not on the thread named "Fred".Hence there is nothing you can do with the run() method.
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com
subject: Unexpected result with Threads join() method...