looking at this code, why Planet class is not a Star class?
posted 11 years ago
looking at the code below, why does the explanation of the code say "The use of inheritance in this code is not justifiable since, conceptually, a planet is-not-a star. "? but the class Planet extends class Star? Thanks for your help.
[ September 14, 2004: Message edited by: Barry Gaunt ]
You are correct that in the code, planet does indeed extend star. but what they are saying is "this is bad - don't do this".
in the "real world", there is no way you could consider a planet to be a star. You would never say "the earth IS-A star" or "Jupiter IS-A star". So this code is not good OO practice. You can't justify doing this.
There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors