This week's giveaway is in the Android forum.
We're giving away four copies of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons and have Godfrey Nolan on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP) and the fly likes K&B Comparator question Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP)
Bookmark "K&B Comparator question" Watch "K&B Comparator question" New topic
Author

K&B Comparator question

Kevin Crays
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Posts: 41
On page 557 in K&B's book it says
If the collection/array you want to search was sorted in natural order, it must be searched in natural order. (This is accomplished by NOT sending a Comparator as an argument to the binarySearch() method.


Why can't you send a Comparator argument? AFAIK, there's no reason why you can't use a comparator to sort/search in naturual order (even if doing that makes little sense).


We're binary code: a one and a zero<br />You wanted violins and you got Nero
Deepak Bala
Bartender

Joined: Feb 24, 2006
Posts: 6661
    
    5

Yep ! but nobody would do it


SCJP 6 articles - SCJP 5/6 mock exams - More SCJP Mocks
Kevin Crays
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 26, 2006
Posts: 41
Originally posted by John Meyers:
Yep ! but nobody would do it


There are lots of things on the test that I can't imagine anyone doing (e.g. Integer Integer = new Integer()), but the quoted paragraph, to me, implies that it cannot be accomplished using a comparator, or that it's illegal to use a comparator.

If it's never tested, then no harm, no foul. Otherwise, I think Bert and Kathy should reword it.
marc weber
Sheriff

Joined: Aug 31, 2004
Posts: 11343

I think the wording is accurate, but could perhaps be expanded on a bit. (I don't have the book, but I'm curious whether there's more context.)

As you've noted, the idea is that the ordering scheme used by a binary search must match whatever ordering was used to sort the collection or array. If natural ordering was used, then there's no need to provide a Comparator to the search method, although you could provide a natural-ordering Comparator.


"We're kind of on the level of crossword puzzle writers... And no one ever goes to them and gives them an award." ~Joe Strummer
sscce.org
Bert Bates
author
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 14, 2002
Posts: 8803
    
    5
I've added a note to consider softening the wording on page 557. I'm not going to count it as an errata, Maybe we'll add the word "typically" - I'm not sure yet.


Spot false dilemmas now, ask me how!
(If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much room.)
 
It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
 
subject: K&B Comparator question
 
Similar Threads
LinkedList and Comparator
Java Comparators
another question about using comparator
need help with Arrays.sort() and compareTo()
Insertion Point Question on binarySearch()