wood burning stoves*
The moose likes Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP) and the fly likes Synchronization doubt: K&B Chp 9, p707 Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP)
Bookmark "Synchronization doubt: K&B Chp 9, p707" Watch "Synchronization doubt: K&B Chp 9, p707" New topic
Author

Synchronization doubt: K&B Chp 9, p707

Denise Advincula
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 163
If two threads are about to execute a synchronized method in a class, and both thread are using the same instance of the class to invoke the method, only one thread at a time will be able to execute the method.


For my code below, the main thread is doing fine, printing what I expected.

But when I started the other threads (A and B), their results are different.



Output is:



I'm expecting that the output for A and B will be like this:

Instead of the same results as the main thread (nicely ordered 1-2-3 printouts), A and B printouts seem intertwined.

What gives?


SCJP/OCPJP 6 | SCWCD/OCPJWCD 5 | OCMJEA in progress...
Denise Advincula
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 163
Even if I add a new class that implements Runnable and assigns it to the new thread, I'm still getting the same output.

Ankit Garg
Sheriff

Joined: Aug 03, 2008
Posts: 9321
    
  17


The problem is at the lines that I have marked. Both the threads are using separate instances of the SyncClass class. You should modify this code as-


SCJP 6 | SCWCD 5 | Javaranch SCJP FAQ | SCWCD Links
Denise Advincula
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 163
Thank you!

I got the idea so I changed it into something like my 2nd post above. However, the printout is still the same. What I did was,

SyncClass - just ordinary class with the synchronized method.
SyncJob - the Runnable class where SyncClass is instantiated and the synchronized method is called.

And then I realized that I'm still creating two different instances for the threads when the run is called. So I made the SyncClass the Runnable class instead, and removed the SyncJob totally.



The output is OK now. However this is not the design I want. I like to call a synchronized method from other classes that don't implement Runnable, and then see the actual synchronizing take effect. Any idea for this?
[ August 12, 2008: Message edited by: Denise Saulon ]
Vinod Kumar Kommineni
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 12, 2008
Posts: 54

The key is for an object not for a method .
so if two threads are running on the same object you will get your output.


check the code above .
you will get the output you expected.


Regards
vinod SCJP 6.0
Denise Advincula
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 01, 2007
Posts: 163
I got it now! Thank you for all your help.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Synchronization doubt: K&B Chp 9, p707