This week's book giveaway is in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum. We're giving away four copies of Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt and have Girish Suryanarayana, Ganesh Samarthyam & Tushar Sharma on-line! See this thread for details.
I have a JSP web page which runs fine with Tomcat, but not with Jrun 4.0. The web page uses �jsp:setProperty� to read a bunch of textboxes all having the same name into a Javabean, where they appear as a string array. The problem occuring with Jrun is that if any of the textboxes on the web page are left empty, values from textboxes further down on the page are shifted into the empty boxes. The Javabean under Jrun doesn�t seem to recognize null string array elements. This problem also seems to occur more consistently with the Netscape browser than with IE, and more consistently with method=post than with method=get, but some users have seen the problem using IE and the JSP having method=get. Any ideas? Thanks.
Let�s see, how to put this nicely... Of course a solution would be to give different names to each textbox. Another solution would be to get out of the computer business altogether. But neither answer meets my needs. I have a JSP page with a variable and possibly large number of similar text boxes, so it�s impractical, inelegant, and maybe not possible to give different names to each textbox. Beyond that, your suggestion doesn�t answer my question, so I don�t learn anything.
General questions: 1) Is it supposed to be all right to use �jsp:setProperty� to read an array into a Javabean? If so, is there a right way and a wrong way to do it? 2) Why does Jrun behave differently in this case than Tomcat? 3) Is there any way to make Jrun behave like Tomcat, that is, not ignore empty string array elements? Thank you in advance for the help.
The issue is that there is no guaruntee on the order of request parameters being sent by the browser or received by the server. You can't assume just because they are in a nice column on your page going from top to bottom, that they will be sent/received in that same order.
It might happen that the parameters get sent in that fashion, but unfortunately you can't count on it. It depends on - the browser sending the parameters in your expected order. - the server receiving them all in order, and then putting them into the parameterValues array in that same order.
That would explain why you get different results using get/post and in different browsers, and different servers.
On top of that, the <jsp:setProperty> tag is documented that it ignores null and empty string, and treats it the same as the property not being there.
Sorry, but the only way to guaruntee that the order of the parameters being sent from the page, is as other posters have indicated, to be able to individually identify each one by name. However all is not lost. There are people who have travelled this path before, and come up with solutions.
Beyond that, your suggestion doesn�t answer my question, so I don�t learn anything.
[DELETED nasty comments]
I'm suggesting you to be nice next time, and hope you've learnt something [ March 01, 2006: Message edited by: Satou kurinosuke ]
Joined: Apr 16, 2005
Thank you for your comments, Messrs. Evans and Bibeault. Concerning what the JSP 2.0 Specification says about a parameter with value of "", I think the horse is referring to a simple parameter, as opposed to an indexed parameter. The specification is apparently vague concerning indexed parameters with empty elements, an impression shared by Mr. Isaacs at http://email@example.com/msg01128.html.
Here�s how matters lay out, as I see it: 1) The JavaServer Pages Specification, Version 2.0, provides for indexed parameters: �Simple and indexed properties can be set using jsp:setProperty.� 3) �When assigning values to indexed properties the value must be an array�. (ibid.) 4) There is no way to guarantee that the user submit an indexed parameter (string array) without empty elements. 5) If empty array elements are dropped by the browser or server, then elements of the indexed parameter (string array) shift around randomly. 6) Of what possible use to anyone is an array with elements that shift around randomly??
It may be that the BeanUtils.populate method is a solution to my problem. I don�t know anything about that stuff, and hate to waste the time learning it unless absolutely necessary. In any case, it sets off my KISS (Keep It Simple, Stupid) alarm like crazy.
Back to my original question: my JSP page runs fine with Tomcat, but not with Jrun 4.0. Given that Tomcat is the Reference Implementation for the JavaServer Pages technology (http://tomcat.apache.org/), I conclude that JRun is behaving badly. Is there any way to make JRun behave nicely in this regard?
I have had no dealings with JRun (thankfully) since the late 90's, so I couldn't tell you if you could change its behavior. I would highly doubt it, though.
I also understand your reluctance to take on 3rd-party libraries to solve what should be a simple problem.
But the situation is that the behaviour of * in this area appears to be only vaguely addressed by the spec, and has already proven to be highly container-dependent. So that's what you've got to deal with.
Personally, I've never used the * mechanism in all of the seven years that I've been working with JSPs. In fact, I never even do this type of procesing in a JSP at all -- I always write page controller servlets to handle the data prior to shipping control off to a JSP to render the view. That gives me complete control over how the data is handled.
My advice would be to either explore that route, or to come up with your own means to collect your data in a manner in which you are guarenteed to get it in the format that you desire.
Joined: Apr 16, 2005
Sorry I haven�t been clear. I�m not using the * mechanism, never have, probably never will: <jsp:setProperty name="beanName" property="*" />
Rather, I�m using something like: <jsp:setProperty name="beanName" property="properyName" param="parameterName" />
and then multiple elements like (irrelevant parts eliminated): <input type=text name="parameterName"> <input type=text name="parameterName" value="11"> <input type=text name="parameterName" value="22"> <input type=text name="parameterName">
...which, when submitted (with method=set), sends something like: ...?parameterName=¶meterName=11¶meterName=22¶meterName=
which should be read by the Javabean as a string array. The result, however, is that somewhere along the line, the empty element  is dropped, and elements  and  are shifted into positions  and . This is clearly untenable.
If it�s not possible to make this work with JRun, then the question is: what is the simplest way, or even any way that works (with JRun), using a JSP, to enter an indexed property, a.k.a. string array, into a Javabean?
Originally posted by Ralph Kehmeier: Rather, I�m using something like: ... jsp:setProperty ...
Same difference. I never use that either.
As I said, I never use a JSP as a data processor.
what is the simplest way, or even any way that works (with JRun), using a JSP, to enter an indexed property, a.k.a. string array, into a Javabean?
If you insist on doing this in a JSP, you'll probably need to write your own code to set the bean properties. So you either need to resort to scriptlet code on the page, munge something together with JSTL <c:set>, or write your own custom action to do this.
Also be aware that the order in which parameters are delivered is not guarenteed to be in any particular order. So if your code is relying on the order of the parameters, you could be surprised at any point in the future when the order changes. [ March 04, 2006: Message edited by: Bear Bibeault ]
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com
subject: Jrun, jsp:setProperty, null string array elements