This week's book giveaway is in the General Computing forum.
We're giving away four copies of Arduino in Action and have Martin Evans, Joshua Noble, and Jordan Hochenbaum on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes JDBC and the fly likes JDBC (oracle) - Thin vs Fat Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login


Win a copy of Arduino in Action this week in the General Computing forum!

A special promo: Enter your blog post or vote on a blogger to be featured in an upcoming Journal
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Databases » JDBC
Reply Bookmark "JDBC (oracle) - Thin vs Fat" Watch "JDBC (oracle) - Thin vs Fat" New topic
Author

JDBC (oracle) - Thin vs Fat

mike, va
Greenhorn

Joined: Jul 31, 2001
Posts: 1
posted
0
Quote
Besides the performance differences. Are there other disadvantages/advantages with the Thin Driver? Transactions? Thanks.
A Agrawal
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2001
Posts: 41
posted
0
Quote
No. just Performance Diff is the only diff...otherwise both give similar results (n no extra methods in any case).

------------------
Amit Agrawal,
New Delhi, India.

Amit Agrawal,<BR>New Delhi, India.
Jamie Robertson
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 09, 2001
Posts: 1879

I like...
MySQL Database Suse
posted private message
0
Quote
Originally posted by mike, va:
Besides the performance differences. Are there other disadvantages/advantages with the Thin Driver? Transactions? Thanks.

Oracle has a summary/comparison of its drivers
http://otn.oracle.com/tech/java/sqlj_jdbc/htdocs/jdbc_faq.htm#_59_
Jamie
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.
 
subject: JDBC (oracle) - Thin vs Fat
 
Similar Threads
Unable to Insert these Chinese Character
MDB calls EJB requires new transaction
Editor Development using JSF
WA #1.....word association
thin client