• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Transaction question

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Dear all
I have a question about JDBC transactions
if we control the boundaries of a normal jdbc transactio, by setting autoCommit() to false and using commit or rollback to end the transaction, and if within the transaction we did a multiple updates , the updated values will not be reflected on the underlaying RDBMS 'till we commit , thats what JDBC specs saying, now
how comes there is something called "DIRTY READ", HOW COMES THAT ANOTHER TRANSACTION WILL READ A "PARTIAL" RESULT FROM ANOTHER ONE???
Thanks
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic