jQuery in Action, 2nd edition*
The moose likes JDBC and the fly likes Connection Pooling Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Databases » JDBC
Bookmark "Connection Pooling" Watch "Connection Pooling" New topic
Author

Connection Pooling

J Craig
Greenhorn

Joined: May 04, 2004
Posts: 15
When using a datasource is it best to have one class that does all database access or is it best to have a seperate object for each type of request to database(update,delete,etc).
Jeanne Boyarsky
internet detective
Marshal

Joined: May 26, 2003
Posts: 30136
    
150

It's mostly a matter of personal preference. I like to have one class for each query or update with the common connection stuff in a superclass. That way the database classes don't get huge. If you only have a couple queries, it probably doesn't matter either way.


[Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions The Smart Way] [Book Promos]
Blogging on Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, OCAJP, OCPJP beta, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Connection Pooling
 
Similar Threads
Prevent duplicate data entry
JDBC......Driver ....
Obtaining auto created id upon finishing insert
Sorting a table based on a column
If and else statements in SQL Query