aspose file tools
The moose likes JDBC and the fly likes Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000 why the difference??? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Databases » JDBC
Reply Bookmark "Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000 why the difference???" Watch "Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000 why the difference???" New topic
Author

Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000 why the difference???

Bilal Ali
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 14, 2007
Posts: 66
Respected Members,
I have a question,when we are using MS Access or SQL Server 2000 as the backend database with Java application than we have to add it to System DSN first and han follow the rest of the procedure, while in case of Oracle 9i we directly pass the connection string in the program and I dont think that we add it to the System DSN in control Panel,can any one please clarify the reason?
Jan Cumps
Bartender

Joined: Dec 20, 2006
Posts: 2343

You specify a DSN datasource when you use the jdbcodbc bridge.
This is a jdbc driver that uses the odbc protocol to talk to your database.

Most databases provide a native jdbc driver. This driver talks to your database without using odbc.
If you use the native driver, you do not have to set up a DSN entry.

Regards, Jan


OCUP UML fundamental
ITIL foundation
Paul Sturrock
Bartender

Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 10336

Just to add to what Jan has already written, you don't need to use ODBC with SQL Server, there are proper, freely available type 4 drivers for it.


JavaRanch FAQ HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.
 
subject: Oracle 9i and SQL Server 2000 why the difference???
 
Similar Threads
Using JBuilder with JBoss 3.2.3
Network Adapter
How to set up a DSN?
JRun not been able to Access the DSN
JDBC with Oracle9i