Meaningless Drivel is fun!
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes ServiceLocator in Pet Store Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "ServiceLocator in Pet Store" Watch "ServiceLocator in Pet Store" New topic

ServiceLocator in Pet Store

Edy Yu
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 21, 2000
Posts: 264
I am browsing Pet Store 1.3.1 from Sun.
Any body can give me a reason why they use one service locator for web tier and the other for Business/EJB tier. The only difference I noticed is the web tier service locator "cache" the references.

SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, SCBCD, SCEA, IBM Certified Enterprise Developer, WebSphere Studio V5.0
Lasse Koskela

Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Posts: 11962
Could it be because of (some of) the following:
a) they wanted to demonstrate two different ways of implementing the service locator pattern.
b) they didn't have the time/interest to write a configurable service locator (cache on/off)
I'm just guessing here...

Author of Test Driven (2007) and Effective Unit Testing (2013) [Blog] [HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch]
Chris Mathews
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 18, 2001
Posts: 2712
c) They wanted to decouple the Web and EJB tiers. Therefore making it much easier to locate them on separate JVMs or even separate physical boxes.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: ServiceLocator in Pet Store
It's not a secret anymore!