File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
http://aspose.com/file-tools
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes EJB object Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "EJB object" Watch "EJB object" New topic
Author

EJB object

vikasids sharma
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 157
Is that the Ejb object(container specific implementation) , skeleton and request interceptor one and the same thing?
thanks
Vikas


Thanks
Vikas Sharma
SCJP(1.4)
Lasse Koskela
author
Sheriff

Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Posts: 11962
    
    5
Good question. At least they're all server-side objects, but I don't know whether they're one and the same.


Author of Test Driven (2007) and Effective Unit Testing (2013) [Blog] [HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch]
vikasids sharma
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 157
oh.dont tell me
i believe skeleton in RMI is replaced by Ejb object in EJB and by request interceptor we mean the physical layer between client and bean instance that provides implicit middleware services to bean instace, which is again what ejb object (implementation of middle ware services)provides.
please do comment!
thanks
vikas
Originally posted by Lasse Koskela:
Good question. At least they're all server-side objects, but I don't know whether they're one and the same.
Pradeep bhatt
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 27, 2002
Posts: 8919

believe skeleton in RMI is replaced by Ejb object in EJB

They are not replaced..ejbObjects are remote objects


Groovy
Lasse Koskela
author
Sheriff

Joined: Jan 23, 2002
Posts: 11962
    
    5
They are not replaced..ejbObjects are remote objects

I believe Vikasids meant that EJBObject is the RMI skeleton object.
vikasids sharma
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 157
yes i say EJB objects in EJB are kinda supersets(they are network enabled and got manny middleware implementations) of skeletons used in RMI
Originally posted by Lasse Koskela:

I believe Vikasids meant that EJBObject is the RMI skeleton object.
vikasids sharma
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 157
soory for any confusion , i m saying lasse is getting in right way..
Originally posted by vikasids sharma:
yes i say EJB objects in EJB are kinda supersets(they are network enabled and got manny middleware implementations) of skeletons used in RMI
Pradeep bhatt
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 27, 2002
Posts: 8919

I believe Vikasids meant that EJBObject is the RMI skeleton object.

If I am not wrong weblogic 6.0 has skeleton classes and so does does websphere.
vikasids sharma
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 01, 2003
Posts: 157
well pradeep i cannot say about weblogic.but EJB specification says we have EJB object as network enabled object(implements java.rmi.remote)
1 .Isn't that EJB object knows how to communicate on network?

if they(skeleton and ejb object) are different.
2. let me know whether skeletons are surrogates for ejb objects or bean instances at server?

Originally posted by Pradeep Bhat:

If I am not wrong weblogic 6.0 has skeleton classes and so does does websphere.
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
 
subject: EJB object