This week's book giveaway is in the Mac OS forum.
We're giving away four copies of a choice of "Take Control of Upgrading to Yosemite" or "Take Control of Automating Your Mac" and have Joe Kissell on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes JTA or JDBC transaction Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "JTA or JDBC transaction" Watch "JTA or JDBC transaction" New topic
Author

JTA or JDBC transaction

Edy Yu
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 21, 2000
Posts: 264
In one session bean, this transaction involves a bunch of SQL calls to database. But all of them are in the same method of this bean. I understand both JTA or regular JDBC level transaction control will work. Which one is prefered though?
Thanks in advance ...


SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, SCBCD, SCEA, IBM Certified Enterprise Developer, WebSphere Studio V5.0
Chris Mathews
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 18, 2001
Posts: 2712
Since you are already using EJB, in this case Session Beans, then it is easiest to just go with CMT which will make use of JTA. However, if you didn't already have this infrastructure in place then I would have went with the simplist solution possible which in this case (without considering any other requirements that I don't know of) would mean plain JDBC.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: JTA or JDBC transaction