This week's book giveaways are in the Java EE and JavaScript forums.
We're giving away four copies each of The Java EE 7 Tutorial Volume 1 or Volume 2(winners choice) and jQuery UI in Action and have the authors on-line!
See this thread and this one for details.
The moose likes EJB and other Java EE Technologies and the fly likes Access to remote memory spaces... Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of The Java EE 7 Tutorial Volume 1 or Volume 2 this week in the Java EE forum
or jQuery UI in Action in the JavaScript forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » EJB and other Java EE Technologies
Bookmark "Access to remote memory spaces... " Watch "Access to remote memory spaces... " New topic

Access to remote memory spaces...

Bryan Noll

Joined: Feb 06, 2004
Posts: 26
Hello all, I'd appreciate it a bunch if you could steer me in the right direction. Let me list the kind of tasks I would like to accomplish. JBoss will be serving the J2EE app we're developing...the architecture will be heavily endowed with Scheduling (probably Quartz) and Workflow (probably JPBM) pieces.

Primarily, I would think that the J2EE server will need access to the memory space of several different windows boxes for the following reasons:
1) The ability to invoke an .exe from the command line for a 3rd party windows app. (And secondarily, to interrogate a MySQL DB located on the same box, which gets updated as a result of the .exe being run.)
2) The ability to interrogate the tables of a 3rd party Microsoft Access mdb (please don't tell me how horrible this is, I already know and wish I didn't have to do it) on numerous user machines.

I'd like to keep whatever we go with on the remote Windows boxes as light and small as possible. I'm thinking something in the way of some service running on these Windows machines able to listen to requests made by the J2EE server. Any suggestions?

I posted this on the Distributed Java forum as well. I wasn't sure where I'd get more responses.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Access to remote memory spaces...