| Author |
instantiation of an extended type with baseclass
|
Mike Nightsky
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 18, 2001
Posts: 48
|
|
I hope i did not dublicat a question, but i didn't know how formulate may search query to find my anser. By the way i searched but didn't come up with a n answer. My question. I have a base class -> A and i have a class thats extends A -> Ab (its extends it only in methods not in data) if i get a A and want a Ab is there a simpler way to acompolish this than crate an constructor in Ab that takes an A and pulls out the values and puts it into the super()-constructor? Maybe its a intermediate question, but i didn't came up with a solution. thanx in advance
|
Win the opportunity to make money on the Internet<br /><a href="http://sweeps.sitesell.com/minirich.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://sweeps.sitesell.com/minirich.html</a>
|
 |
Paul Sturrock
Bartender
Joined: Apr 14, 2004
Posts: 10336
|
|
|
You could just cast your object to the type you want.
|
JavaRanch FAQ HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch
|
 |
Mike Nightsky
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 18, 2001
Posts: 48
|
|
|
Thanx Mike
|
 |
Stan James
(instanceof Sidekick)
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jan 29, 2003
Posts: 8791
|
|
I'm not sure what you're trying to do. Maybe this? A one = new A(); Ab two = (Ab)one; That won't work because one is an instance of A which IS NOT an Ab. If you really need an Ab you might do what you suggested: Ab two = new Ab(one); This is a good time to ask yourself if "extends" was the right way to define Ab. An alternative is to make Ab just extend Object, hold a reference to an A instance, and pass any method calls through to that instance. For polymorphism you could make A and Ab implement the same interface for the methods on A. Does that fit the problem?
|
A good question is never answered. It is not a bolt to be tightened into place but a seed to be planted and to bear more seed toward the hope of greening the landscape of the idea. John Ciardi
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: instantiation of an extended type with baseclass
|
|
|