aspose file tools*
The moose likes Ruby and the fly likes OO in Java compared to OO in Ruby, RoR Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Spring in Action this week in the Spring forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Languages » Ruby
Bookmark "OO in Java compared to OO in Ruby, RoR" Watch "OO in Java compared to OO in Ruby, RoR" New topic
Author

OO in Java compared to OO in Ruby, RoR

Sree Va
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 28, 2007
Posts: 38
While Java is still evolving and going Open Source, too;
Why bring another OO language into this world?
Why not put all that effort to make Ruby, RoR, into Open Source Java and make it more RICH?
For example, what difference would it make searching on yahoo or on google, you still get ennumerous results to 'pick', still?


We believe that every being is divine, is God. Every soul is a sun covered over with clouds of ignorance; the difference between soul and soul is owing to the difference in density of these layers of clouds. - Swami Vivekananda
Justin Gehtland
author
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 30, 2007
Posts: 31
I'd say the biggest barricade to pouring that effort into Java is the glacial pace of change of Java, due to the processes surrounding modifications to the core language and libraries. Which isn't to say it won't change, or good work isn't being done. Far from it. But for speed of change, a smaller, totally open source project is going to win every time.

What I find so appealing is that the Java community is rallying and finding out how to adopt many of the features of Ruby and Rails that make it compelling. JRuby, SEAM, Sails, Tapestry, and many other projects are racing to learn the lessons and take what can be taken.
Sree Va
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 28, 2007
Posts: 38
Oops! My bad. I shouldn't have compared Java with Ruby, in the first place.



http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/
The Ideals of Ruby�s Creator

Ruby is a language of careful balance. Its creator, Yukihiro �matz� Matsumoto, blended parts of his favorite languages (Perl, Smalltalk, Eiffel, Ada, and Lisp) to form a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.

He has often said that he is �trying to make Ruby natural, not simple,� in a way that mirrors life.

Building on this, he adds:

Ruby is simple in appearance, but is very complex inside, just like our human body1.
Guy Allard
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 24, 2000
Posts: 776
Just for general information: when matz came out with Ruby, Java did not exist and would not for about another 3 years.

Guy
[ January 30, 2007: Message edited by: Guy Allard ]
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: OO in Java compared to OO in Ruby, RoR