jQuery in Action, 3rd edition
The moose likes Swing / AWT / SWT and the fly likes Question Regarding MVC Approach Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Introducing JavaFX 8 Programming this week in the JavaFX forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Swing / AWT / SWT
Bookmark "Question Regarding MVC Approach" Watch "Question Regarding MVC Approach" New topic

Question Regarding MVC Approach

David Dickinson
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 11, 2004
Posts: 66
Hi All,

I'm looking primarily for non-technical replies it's more an opinion based post.

I have implemented the following approach:

// MVC Approach //
Class Model (observable)- holds the collection storing my data. Sets class GUI as an observer.
Class GUI (observer) - displays a table displaying the collection data

When changes are made in the model it uses the following code to alert its observers - setChanged() & notifyObservers().

The GUI implements the update method which is ran when notifyObservers is called, in the update method I call updates on the table to make it refresh.

Is this the correct way to implement MVC? I have heard rumors that my table should be directly observing the model and shouldn't need to call the repaint method.

I'm starting to get confused again so any advice appreciated.

Thank you
Gregg Bolinger
GenRocket Founder
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 11, 2001
Posts: 15302

Speaking specifically about JTable's....

You should create a TableModel and give this model to your JTable. Then you can modify the data in the table model which will notify the table when changes are made.

I think you are just overthinking it a bit. Your design would be good for components that don't really have a model and still need to be updated in some way (JTextFields, JLabels, etc).

GenRocket - Experts at Building Test Data
Scott Delap
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 05, 2005
Posts: 73
If your model is used elsewhere in the system, you could also write an adapter that implements table model and uses your model for the actual data storage. Otherwise, I'm with Greg that just using tablemodel would be best.
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: Question Regarding MVC Approach
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition