| Author |
Shuffling poker chips
|
Nick George
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 04, 2004
Posts: 815
|
|
|
I have stack of x/2 green poker chips, sitting on top of x/2 red poker chips. When I shuffle my stack of chips, I separate the chips into the top half and the bottom half. I then alternate laying down a chip from the left and then right stack. How many times must I shuffle my stack of x chips such that they return to their original formation of green on top, red on bottom?
|
I've heard it takes forever to grow a woman from the ground
|
 |
Tim West
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Posts: 539
|
|
When you separate the big pile into two stacks, does the top pile go to the left or right stack? I'm sensing an off-by-one error If top -> left, then for x=1 the answer is 2, if top -> right, the answer is 1. --Tim
|
 |
Nick George
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 04, 2004
Posts: 815
|
|
|
Let's start it of with an easy base: how many shuffles until the chips resegregate, with all of the chips of one color together, regardless of which stack is on top, and which is on bottom.
|
 |
Nick George
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 04, 2004
Posts: 815
|
|
i forgot to mention: when one shuffles, one takes from the bottom of the stack, not the top. And now for a random, gratuitus smiley:
|
 |
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 10043
|
|
|
if x = 2, then the answer is 0.
|
Never ascribe to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity.
|
 |
Tim West
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 15, 2004
Posts: 539
|
|
You could argue that the answer is zero for all x, but I think you have to assume there's at least one shuffle. I'd say the answer for x = 2 is 1 :-) Meanwhile, I'm still tearing up bits of paper on my desk to use as poker chips :-/ --Tim
|
 |
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 10043
|
|
I took 4 quarters, and stacked them from top to bottom as H-H-T-T. divided them into two stack, T-T and H-H. I then stacked them back up by dropping the bottom quarter from each stack into a new pile, alternating stacks. I started with the right stack, or heads. i ended up with T-H-T-H. again divided, putting the top to quarters to the right. i had two stacks with H on top, and T on bottom. i restacked them as before, dropping the bottom quarter from each stack, alternating, starting on the right. i ended up with H-H-T-T. so, two shuffled reversed the original order. i would therefor assume 4 shuffles would restore it back to where i started. i then repeated with 6 quarters. here's the stacks after each divide and shuffle... H-H-H-T-T-T (initial condition) T-H-T-H-T-H 1st shuffle H-T-T-H-H-T 2nd shuffle H-H-H-T-T-T 3rd shuffle and now 8 quarters HHHHTTTT initial THTHTHTH 1 shuffle TTHHTTHH 2 shuffles TTTTHHHH 3 shuffles my boss just got to work, so now i have to stop my experiments.
|
 |
Mario Loweystro
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 2
|
|
Hey everyone- I made a program for this and figured it all out for all x up to 500. I don't see any pattern, and it's starting to bug me. Check out what I found at http://www.freewebs.com/sedatesnail . (Sorry, the program's not up yet, but the list is). I'm new here, so I don't know if making a program is the "easy cop-out" answer... but it's all I've got. -Mario
|
 |
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 10043
|
|
Mario, Welcome!! IMHO, writing a program is not an "easy cop-out" answer. You're probably gonna get some funny looks around here since you say you wrote it in C++, and this IS the JAVA Ranch, but whatever! your data is really interesting... i especially find the places like 61 20 62 100 63 7 where adding 1 more chip makes such a drastic difference. i may have to think about this one some more...
|
 |
Mario Loweystro
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 19, 2004
Posts: 2
|
|
Hey... oh yeah, the "Java Ranch" hehe. Well I only know C++ so far- I took one course in it in high school. I'll be learning Java as I start college in a few days... I just found this site on a Google search. One thing that might affect it is the factors of each number... for example, multiples of 7 tend to take very few shuffles. Even numbers tend to take more shuffles than odd numbers. There are probably a bunch of other patterns like this. What's interesting is when the patterns collide... for example, 7's take few shuffles but 2's take many... then 14 takes a whopping 28 shuffles. Also, it seems that the highest number of shuffles it can possibly take is double the number of chips.
|
 |
james mulhern
Greenhorn
Joined: Dec 27, 2005
Posts: 3
|
|
The equation to this problem is not a simple one, as you might have guessed if you've spent some time thinking about it, but I believe it looks as follows: 2^x = 1 [modulo(n-1)], (I prefer to think of it as 2^x-1 = 0[modulo(n-1)] where n = the total # of chips (both stacks), and x = the number of shuffles required to return the system to its original position. Let me give an example solution: For a stack of 10 chips (5 in each pile), the total number of shuffles is again given as: 2^x = 1[modulo(10-1)], or 2^x-1 = 0[modulo 9] Now this next step takes a little "guess and check." You need to figure out the lowest power of two (minus one) which will give an integar result when divided by nine: 2^5 = 32 32-1= 31 31/9 = 3.4444 (non-integar) - wrong solution 2^6 = 64 64-1 = 63 63/9 = 7 (integar) - solution This means that number of shuffles required for two stacks of 5 chips to return to there original position is 6. This is the same result we get when we actually try shuffling the chips. Try it for other numbers- it works! By the way- for odd numbers, just use the equation 2^x-1= 0[modulo(n)], which will give you the same result as the even number of chips immediately following (# of shuffles for 5 chips = # of shuffles for 6 chips).
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Shuffling poker chips
|
|
|