Howdy! I think this question is an interesting one. Imagine this situation: 1. We have a class Base with public method makeReady(). 2. Base calls makeReady() from within its constructor. 3. We make a class Derived that extends Base and overrides the makeReady() method. My question is this: What happens when we try: "Derived d = new Derived();"? More specifically, when the constructor in Derived calls Base's constructor (which is always done because Base is its parent class), Base's constructor calls the makeReady() method... who's makeReady() method does it call? If you think the answer is obviously that in this case, Derived's makeReady() method is called by Base's constructor, you may be right about the answer (I'm not sure), but you're wrong that it's obvious. In C++, the above scenario does NOT work this way. Instead, in C++, when Base's constructor is called through Derived's constructor, the virtual makeReady() method call in Base's constructor will use Base's own makeReady() method. I don't understand why this happens in C++, and I don't know what happens in Java. It's easy enough to test this out with code, but what I'm more curious about is the REASON why each language works the way it does. Here is a link to the C++ explanation, which I don't fully understand: http://www.research.att.com/~bs/bs_faq2.html#vcall Help, please! Thanks!
Well, my opinion is that the Base's makeReady() method is called. Why? Because the constructor of Base doesn't know anything about Derived. So there is no polymorphism involved here. As written in the article you gave the link for, the objects are constructed from the base up, so when Base's constructor is called, there is no Derived object (after all, that is what we are doing, constructing a Derived object). Hope this helps!
--<br />Linux registered user 287835<br /> <br />Be different. Think.