My question would be: Why would one use an abstract class verses an Interface With abstract I guess you only have methods and interfaces you have fields and methods predefined But why would you choose one over the other and what is the importance of abstract classes? thanks, nick :
Joined: Jan 29, 2003
There are pros & cons to both that usually lead you to find the right one for the situation. An abstract class can have code in it. I wrote an abstract handler for a SAX XML parser. It has some significant code in it to help you do a particular kind of parsing. But some of the most important methods must be overridden to do anything useful, so the class is abstract. Pro: Developers who extend it get the benefit of the methods I wrote. Con: They can only extend one class, so they are prevented from extending some other useful thing at the same time. An interface cannot have code in it. Con: Developers who implement it must write all the required methods. Pro: They can extend some other useful class at the same time. Some parts of the JDK mix the two. They specify an interface, and also provide a usable implementation or an abstract implementation that you can extend if you like.
A good question is never answered. It is not a bolt to be tightened into place but a seed to be planted and to bear more seed toward the hope of greening the landscape of the idea. John Ciardi
Joined: May 24, 2003
I gotcha a just read the chapter in deitel and deitel and I understand it fully now. thanks