This week's book giveaway is in the OCMJEA forum. We're giving away four copies of OCM Java EE 6 Enterprise Architect Exam Guide and have Paul Allen & Joseph Bambara on-line! See this thread for details.
Interesting question !!! Some basic fundamental: 1) "Whenever you refer to a class without a package name(not imported) then you refer to the package of the class you are working on." 2) The package of an inner class is the same as the containing class appended with the name of the outer class. In your code the package of inner ABC will be InClassTest(name of the containing class)(You can test this by opening the compiled class using jad). But, inside the containing class you have an option of not specifying this package name, the compiler does it for you. 3) One can not import any class from the default package from a named package.
Now, in your case, there is a class in the default package named ABC and there is a class in the named package InClassTest with the same name ABC. But, since the class in the named package is an inner class so you have the option of using the class name without its package. This relaxation comes with a burden though .. now, you lose references to any class from default package of the same name. Also, you can not import that class since its in the default package
This is not a big issue , since as a best practise, one always defines classes under a named package. If all your classes are defined under a package(eg test), you can refer to the outer class as test.ABC and the inner one as just ABC or alternatively as test.InClassTest.ABC.