jQuery in Action, 3rd edition
The moose likes Ruby and the fly likes [Practical Ruby Gems - Question] Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Languages » Ruby
Bookmark "[Practical Ruby Gems - Question]" Watch "[Practical Ruby Gems - Question]" New topic

[Practical Ruby Gems - Question]

Prabhakar Chaganti
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 30, 2004
Posts: 50
Hi David,

How would you compare gems to the standard python packaging format of eggs?


Packt Author Page (http://www.packtpub.com/author_view_profile/id/120)
David Berube

Joined: Jun 18, 2007
Posts: 26
They very similar; Python Eggs were essentially a reply to RubyGems, and embody most of the same features; versioning, dependencies, archiving, etc. RubyGems might be slightly more mature than Python Eggs - the Python Eggs dev site lists it as "close to beta quality" - but I definitely wouldn't use either as a reason to choose a language.

Both take essentially the same problem and solve it in more or less the same way.

Take it easy,

David Berube
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: [Practical Ruby Gems - Question]
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition