Once again I come to JavaRanch for help. :-) Ok, I have created a vector in class. But I can't seem to get any of the methods in my vector to work. Vector v = new Vector(); int z=0; z = v.elementAt(1).weirdMethod(); Assume weirdMethod works fine and returns an int. I get a compiler error: unresolved symbol at, z= v.elementAt(1).weirdMethod(); It seems from this that you would get compiler errors all the time, since the Vector wouldn't know what kind of objects are put in, therefore couldn;t find the method. ::Sigh:: I think I am missing something pretty basic here, I seem to always leave my questions short, so don't be afriad to ask for more information.
To do this kind of things you need to cast your object you can cast the Object from the specific Class if you know it or to an interface implemented by all the Object in your Vector; So for me test this
Vector v = new Vector(); int z=0; AnObjectWithWeirdMethod myOject = new AnObjectWithWeirdMethod(); v.add(myObject); z = ((AnObjectWithWeirdMethod)v.elementAt(0)).weirdMethod();
hope it helps
------------------ Benjamin l�onard evisor
Joined: Mar 29, 2001
That's it! I thought about casting it before, but didn't realize that you could cast part of the dot notation. Answer seems obvious now. Thanks! Bill Norton
Why is it that in Java you can't have a vector of a certain type - so that you wouldn't have to cast everything on the way out. Is this so that things can be resolved at compile time? Using STL in C++ you can have a vector of class A, which is nice. Thanks.
Please ignore post, I have no idea what I am talking about.
If you want a Vector for a specific class, you can write your own wrapperclass. Here is a class that take the primitive type int and put it in a Vector, there also is a method to get the values back as an int.
[This message has been edited by Cindy Glass (edited December 19, 2001).]