abstract problem

[mark smith]

hi

public class Passerelle{
  static List lstIpServeur;
  static List lstIpClient;
  static List lstPort;
  public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
    ServeurPasserelle serveurpasserelle = new ServeurPasserelle();
    serveurpasserelle.start();
  }
}

another class

abstract public class Protocol {
    public Passerelle passerelle;
 
    public Protocol(){
  passerelle = new Passerelle();
    }
    abstract public String processInput(String theInput, Socket socket);
}

in another class (ServeurPasserelleThread )i do

ProtocolPasserelleServeur protocol = new ProtocolPasserelleServeur();
protocol.processInput("test");

and the last class

public class ProtocolPasserelleServeur extends  Protocol{
    private  final int WAITING = 0;
    private  final int SENT = 1;
    private int state = WAITING;
    public String processInput(String theInput, Socket socket) {
            lstIpServeur.add(socket.getInetAddress());
        }
        return theOutput;
    }
}

java don't seem to like that

i'm not able to have access to Passerelle list...

any idea

[Jesper de Jong]

Originally posted by collinm:
java don't seem to like that

i'm not able to have access to Passerelle list...

any idea

What does "java don't seem to like that" mean?

Does your code compile or not? Do you get any errors? If so, copy and paste the error message. If your program does not produce errors, but it doesn't work like you expect, please explain what you expect it to do and how that differs from what it actually does.

You probably meant to write:

public class ProtocolPasserelleServeur extends  Protocol{
    private  final int WAITING = 0;
    private  final int SENT = 1;
    private int state = WAITING;
    public String processInput(String theInput, Socket socket) {
            Passerelle.lstIpServeur.add(socket.getInetAddress());
        }
        return theOutput;
    }
}

lstIpServeur is a static variable in class Passerelle. If you don't tell the compiler that it is in class Passerelle, it is not going to work.
[ November 25, 2005: Message edited by: Jesper de Jong ]