They're not "tags", they're "operators". Anyway...
The << operator is being used to create integers that are various powers of two. If you take the integer 1, then that's 2 to the power zero. If you bit-shift it once to the left, you get 2, which is 2 to the power 1. Shift again, you get 4, which is 2 to the power 2 etc.
The original developer could easily just have written the constants 1, 2, 4 etc. The reason for the more complicated way of writing it is probably to make it clear that these are all powers of two. They are, in fact, probably bit-masks for a value that's a bitset of flags.
(later) ... although actually it looks like the values are all different ways of opening some resource. They sound as if they're probably mutally-exclusive. In which case, use bit-masks, bitsets etc. is probably overkill. You might be able to accuse the original developer of being a smart-arse. [ April 24, 2006: Message edited by: Peter Chase ]
Betty Rubble? Well, I would go with Betty... but I'd be thinking of Wilma.