Why do we use a thing that doesn't have any implementation ?
Let's change your question a little bit. How does a class look to a client? Isn't it just a bunch of method invocations? The client has a type and one or more associated operations for that type. Given a reference type String, a client may invoke one of many available operations. Sometimes the client only wants a subset of those operations, but in any case, the client is exposed to many operations ("needle in a haystack") implied by the so-called "OO paradigm". Then, the client "interfaces" to an implementation through a very strict and formally defined contract. Isn't it then obvious what the advantages are of separating that contract from the implementataion of the contract?
Think a bit more. I won't do your homework for you