This week's giveaway is in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum. We're giving away four copies of EJB 3 in Action and have Debu Panda, Reza Rahman, Ryan Cuprak, and Michael Remijan on-line! See this thread for details.
Here 0x88 = -120. When we do the bitwise AND, its implicitely converted to an integer and since 0xff = 255, we should get the same number as output. So, the variable i must be equal to -120. Why am I getting a positive result (136).
Are the extra bits simply added(prefixed) without maintaining the negative sign. If that's the case, then the answer is fine. But why is this so.
So, is (byte)0x88 is automatically converted to 0x00000088 while performing the bitwise AND. Then why doesn't
convert 0x88 to 0x00000088. Here, it uses the negative value.
What I want to ask is that while doing bitwise operation, the sign bit is not taken into consideration and zeros are blindly prefixed. But while doing non-bitwise operations such as addition, multiplication etc, the sign bit is not compromised with. Why?