File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes Beginning Java and the fly likes Question about this Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Beginning Java
Bookmark "Question about this" Watch "Question about this" New topic

Question about this

Corrado Grabbi

Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 2

In the past I've always taken the implicit "this" variable for granted, that is to say in a given instance it's a reference back to that instance.

Yesterday, whilst doing some technical online tests, I came across this notation, where "this" is seemingly referenced via a static member of the class type ( note this is how it seems from the syntax, not sure what actually is going on ), e.g.

Returning in the toString method is self explanatory, but the Employee prefix is throwing me, the syntax implies that "this" is a static member of the Employee class, but this doesn't make sense given that the whole point of "this" is that is it's a reference per instance.

Can anyone elighten me on this?

Joel McNary

Joined: Aug 20, 2001
Posts: 1824

Typically, you see syntax like that in Inner Classes, where the "this" reference would normally refer to the instance of the inner class instead of the instance of the enclosing class. If you prefix "this" with the enclosing class, you now have a reference to that instance.

Confused? Consider:

Note that in the line labeled 20, there is a MyPanel.this.doAction() call. You could just say "doAction()" and the compiler will figure it out -- but I don't like it because it breaks the subject-verb paradigm that I program in (but that's an argument for another thread).

But you can't say "this.doAction()," as the "this" refers to the instance of the anonymous ActionListener that we are creating. So, in order to get "this" to reference the MyPanel instance, we have to say "MyPanel.this.doAction()"

Piscis Babelis est parvus, flavus, et hiridicus, et est probabiliter insolitissima raritas in toto mundo.
Corrado Grabbi

Joined: Jul 03, 2007
Posts: 2
Ah yes - thanks.

Makes perfect sense in context of inner classes - I guess I was thrown as I'd never seen this syntax outside of inner classes.

I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Question about this
It's not a secret anymore!