You can make a concrete class that implements the interface or extends the abstract class. The compiler will require the concrete class to provide all the abstract methods. Here's a concrete class you could instantiate:
And there's another tricky way to create a class right in line instead of defining it in its own file:
That looks a lot like we instantiated Runnable, an interface, but in fact we defined a tiny class with a run() method. It has no name so it's called anonymous, but it's a perfectly good little class as far as the compiler's concerned.
Does that all make sense?
A good question is never answered. It is not a bolt to be tightened into place but a seed to be planted and to bear more seed toward the hope of greening the landscape of the idea. John Ciardi
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com