This week's giveaway is in the Spring forum.We're giving away four copies of Learn Spring Security (video course) and have Eugen Paraschiv on-line!See this thread for details.
Win a copy of Learn Spring Security (video course) this week in the Spring forum!

# Sum of Digits

Sam Benry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 89
This is really weird, Im sure my code is correct, donno why the result is wrong, its supposed to be a huge number in the end I guess, but Im always getting 262660

Problem:
Work out the first ten digits of the sum of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers.

My CODE:

Henry Wong
author
Marshal
Posts: 20880
75

Work out the first ten digits of the sum of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers.

This ...

is more like... "Work out the sum of the ASCII values of all digits of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers".

The problem never asked you to sum up the digits, it just asked you to ignore any digit higher than the 10th digit in the sum of the numbers. You also did a staight convert from char to num, which is the ASCII value, not the digit value (not that it matters as you weren't supposed to sum the digits anyway).

Henry
[ March 23, 2008: Message edited by: Henry Wong ]

Sam Benry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 89
I still did not get it
the problem, as I understand, wants the sum of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers
but since the number is huge, the first ten digits are enough to prove a person solved the problem...
isn't this the problem?
if not, can you explain it more?
if I should not sum the digits up, then what should I do?

it just asked you to ignore any digit higher than the 10th digit in the sum of the numbers.

so I find the sum, and show the first ten digits then?

and this maybe better to solve the other problem

[ March 23, 2008: Message edited by: Sam Benry ]

Henry Wong
author
Marshal
Posts: 20880
75
I still did not get it
the problem, as I understand, wants the sum of the following one-hundred 50-digit numbers
but since the number is huge, the first ten digits are enough to prove a person solved the problem...
isn't this the problem?

Yup, you described it perfectly here.

if I should not sum the digits up, then what should I do?

How did you go from "sum of the numbers" to "sum of the digits"?

For example, lets use 3 numbers instead of 100. Let's use 4 digits numbers instead of 50 digits. And lets look at the first 2 digits instead of 10.

The numbers are...

1234
1001
4532

The sum is 1234 + 1001 + 4532 = 6767. And the first 2 digits are 67.

What you did is... 1 + 2 + 3 + 4 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 4 + 5 + 3 + 2 = 26. How is this even close?

Henry
[ March 23, 2008: Message edited by: Henry Wong ]

Sam Benry
Ranch Hand
Posts: 89
thanks, problem solved
this is even easier than before...

Rob Spoor
Sheriff
Posts: 20492
54
Originally posted by Sam Benry:

You can omit the entire "add the int to an empty string" construction by using the String.valueOf methods. It's just a bit more efficient, gives the exact same results and also (IMHO) looks better.

If you are 100% sure these characters are all numbers, you can use the following code as well:

Jesus Obed Murillo Hernandez
Greenhorn
Posts: 3
You must sum the 100 numbers of 50 digits, are you able to solve this at this moment?, because I am on it.

fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender
Posts: 12083
29
Sam,

It's generally considered polite to name the source of your question. In this case, you are talking about problem #13 of Project Euler, a fantastic place to get little 'puzzlers' to learn a new computing language.

In the future, please let everyone know where these problems come from.

Thanks

Campbell Ritchie
Sheriff
Posts: 48363
56
Welcome to JavaRanch, Jesus

We don't like to give out answers like that; please show us what you have already. And it might have been better to start a new thread; look at this deradfully-named FAQ!

Fred, I always get into disagreements about this, but there is nothing "little" about Project Euler tasks. They may take only a few lines to write, but as Sam Benry has demonstrated, they are *@*#\$~ difficult!