Another question for you guys, it from John Meyers' mock test.
The code has compilation error on line 2.
My question is why the compilation pass the line 1? n is a final as well?
Henry Zhi Lin
Joined: Nov 04, 2008
Just had another thought, it pass line one because it change the n's object's x value, but does not change reference n to other object (still point to the old object with x changed). Unlike n, number++ change it reference to other primitive object?
Am I right? [ November 07, 2008: Message edited by: Henry Zhi Lin ]