| Author |
Not totally relying on UML
|
Nachiket Patel
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 16, 2007
Posts: 110
|
|
Is there someone who is not relying totally on UML? If not, then what tools or language/diagram are used?
|
Before software can be reusable, it first has to be usable. - Ralph Johnson
|
 |
Sergey Arnaut
Greenhorn
Joined: Nov 03, 2008
Posts: 7
|
|
Before UML people used IDEF group, from ICAM family. Or may be SADT. Thanks to US Air Defence)))))) As of 1995 methods 5 through 14 have not been pursued in depth.[2] Methods: IDEF0 : Function modeling IDEF1 : Information Modeling IDEF1X : Data Modeling IDEF2 : Simulation Model Design IDEF3 : Process Description Capture IDEF4 : Object-Oriented Design IDEF5 : Ontology Description Capture IDEF6 : Design Rationale Capture IDEF7 : Information System Auditing IDEF8 : User Interface Modeling IDEF9 : Scenario-Driven IS Design IDEF10 : Implementation Architecture Modeling IDEF11 : Information Artifact Modeling IDEF12 : Organization Modeling IDEF13 : Three Schema Mapping Design IDEF14 : Network Design Main difference is that IDEF is hard to reuse. If something was changed in model - we must redesign the whole model (In UML we can divide model into independent blocks, which can act independently). That`s why there were need to UML was created. But I think IDEF model is good too. It`s more comlex to learn, but more simple to understand for specialists. For using IDEF, I think best programm is BPwin. I designed there IDEF0,IDEF1 and IDEF3 models. [ November 21, 2008: Message edited by: Sergey Arnaut ] [ November 21, 2008: Message edited by: Sergey Arnaut ]
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Not totally relying on UML
|
|
|