permaculture playing cards*
The moose likes Struts and the fly likes Why Spend the time on Struts 2? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Frameworks » Struts
Bookmark "Why Spend the time on Struts 2?" Watch "Why Spend the time on Struts 2?" New topic

Why Spend the time on Struts 2?

Don Milotte

Joined: Aug 20, 2008
Posts: 1
After having somewhat "mastered" Struts 1.x, and with all the other competing frameworks out there, why should I spend time learning Struts 2? And why not stay with what I know : Struts 1?
David Newton

Joined: Sep 29, 2008
Posts: 12617

After having somewhat "mastered" Struts 1.x, and with all the other competing frameworks out there, why should I spend time learning Struts 2? And why not stay with what I know: Struts 1?

From some perspective sticking with what we already know is a perfectly acceptable solution and may suit our needs just fine. Of course, we could say the same thing about COBOL or PL/1, too ;)

As far as competing frameworks go, sure, there are several other viable options along with Struts 2. All have their advantages and disadvantages. Each may be more, or less, appropriate depending on various criteria, perhaps project- or environment-specific.

From an architectural and cleanliness standpoint regarding Struts 1 v. Struts 2, however, IMO Struts 2 comes out way ahead. For me the biggest improvements were testability, type conversion, and a better separation of concerns, although that can depend on how the Struts 1 application was developed.

This last bit is anecdotal, but I've been using Struts 1 since 1.0. I've now been using Struts 2 since the XWork changeover, and I wouldn't even consider using Struts 1 for a new project--the benefits of Struts 2 are just too great. I'm comfortable recommending Struts 2 to others as well; the Apache community is solid and stable. That doesn't mean there aren't other Java-based frameworks worth considering, of course.

Sherif Shehab
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 05, 2007
Posts: 483

Hi , there are some diffrences between Struts 1 and 2 , check this and this

Scotty Boy Sinclair

Joined: Sep 11, 2008
Posts: 5
A BIG benefit of struts2 for me was calling getters of the action object in a clean way.

Typically in a web MVC application the execute() method has to work out the view requirements based on the request/session parameters and then load the data from the database acordingly. The view is then generated via JSP which then uses the preloaded objects.

This is bad imo because the view requirements (as captured in the JSP) is duplicated in the execute() method logic.

But since struts2 allows you to call any action getter from the view. The view can drive the data retrieval requirements by making the action perform lazy loading in each getter method. This also makes the actions more reusable since they are less view specific.

I find this very powerfull especially if you have complex user specific views.

I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Why Spend the time on Struts 2?
Similar Threads
A research about struts 2
Is struts outdated ?
Struts 2 questions
Requested resource not available --in servlet and struts application
Struts2 and Spring integration