aspose file tools*
The moose likes Meaningless Drivel and the fly likes Frightened of ghosts ??? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Other » Meaningless Drivel
Bookmark "Frightened of ghosts ???" Watch "Frightened of ghosts ???" New topic
Author

Frightened of ghosts ???

shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
Cricketer Shane Watson recently had a ghostly experience in his hotel room in England during the recent Ashes series. Most of the castles in UK are said to be haunted by ghosts.
Personally, I am quite frightened of ghosts , especially the female ones . Some who claim to be brave enough still have a fear of ghosts lurking in the corner of the mind.
Can there really be anyone who is 100% free of ghost fears???


Warm Regards, S.Iyer
SCJP1.4, SCWCD1.4
Barry Gaunt
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Posts: 7729
What ghosts?


Ask a Meaningful Question and HowToAskQuestionsOnJavaRanch
Getting someone to think and try something out is much more useful than just telling them the answer.
Satish Chilukuri
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 266
Show me a ghost and then I will decide whether to be afraid of it or not.
Mani Ram
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 11, 2002
Posts: 1140
Originally posted by Satish Chilukuri:
Show me a ghost and then I will decide whether to be afraid of it or not.


Hmmm...you are not married, right?


Mani
Quaerendo Invenietis
shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
Hmmm...you are not married, right?


So.....does this apply to him or his wife ???
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: shankar Iyer ]
Satish Chilukuri
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 23, 2005
Posts: 266
Originally posted by Mani Ram:


Hmmm...you are not married, right?


Yes. But I would never marry a ghost. I would prefer someone who is alive
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: Satish Chilukuri ]
Arjunkumar Shastry
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 28, 2005
Posts: 986
Originally posted by Satish Chilukuri:
Show me a ghost and then I will decide whether to be afraid of it or not.




Namma Suvarna Karnataka
R K Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 5371
Originally posted by Satish Chilukuri:
Show me a ghost and then I will decide whether to be afraid of it or not.


Becareful while shaving


"Thanks to Indian media who has over the period of time swiped out intellectual taste from mass Indian population." - Chetan Parekh
Sripathi Krishnamurthy
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 232
I would love to have a female ghost in my room. specially a beautiful looking female ghost.
shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
I would love to have a female ghost in my room. specially a beautiful looking female ghost..


Then rest assured that it is a female Dracula!!!
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: shankar Iyer ]
Chetan Parekh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 3636
Originally posted by Sripathi Krishnamurthy:
I would love to have a female ghost in my room. specially a beautiful looking female ghost.


In some of the item girls dancing in remixed video looks like a ghost due to over make-up and siliconized body.

Browse thru music channels in night.


My blood is tested +ve for Java.
Chetan Parekh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 16, 2004
Posts: 3636
Originally posted by shankar Iyer:
Cricketer Shane Watson recently had a ghostly experience in his hotel room in England during the recent Ashes series.


Send our Indian Cricket team to play in Australia, they will surely have same ghostly experience from Australian team.

Have you forget the ghostly experience Indian Cricket team had from New Zealand team in a series before last world-cup?
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender

Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 11479
    
  16

There has never been any scientific evidence of Ghosts. Or ANY supernatural activity.

Anyone who believes they can demonstrate such paranormal activities is eligible for a $1 million (U.S.) prize from the James Randi Educational Foundation.

More info can be found here:

JREF

Having said that, ghosts do not frighten me, because they don't exist.


There are only two hard things in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors
R K Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 5371
Originally posted by fred rosenberger:
Or ANY supernatural activity.


I beg to differ you.

Supernatural activities, yes, they do exist.

And those supernatural activities makes me sometime to believe in God.
basha khan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: 516
Originally posted by shankar Iyer:

Can there really be anyone who is 100% free of ghost fears???


Yes .I am.
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender

Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 11479
    
  16

Supernatural activities, yes, they do exist.

They have never been duplicated in a strictly controlled scientific experiement.

If you choose to believe something, more power to you. I have never seen or read of anything other than anecdotal evidence by non-trained observers that something happened.

I'm not trying to argue faith, religion, the existance of a God or Gods. You are free to believe what you want, as am I. And i choose to not believe in something unless there is hard evidence in support of it.

So, i stand by my statement of SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: fred rosenberger ]
shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
]So, i stand by my statement of SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.


Fred,

Not Everything can be explained by science.
For example , a close friend of mine can exactly spot a location where underground water exists. He says he does it just by intuition!!!
Can science explain this???

rgrds,
Shankar
Ernest Friedman-Hill
author and iconoclast
Marshal

Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: 24187
    
  34

Originally posted by shankar Iyer:

Can science explain this???


Perhaps not. But science could measure it. I'll believe in your friend's abilities if you can show me a double-blind study by an outside observer, in which a statistically significant number of spots your friend identified were all drilled, and the success rate measured, and a comparison was made to both random selections and to selections made by a randomly chosen individual. Until then, you're providing anecdotal evidence, which is pretty much worthless.


[Jess in Action][AskingGoodQuestions]
R K Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 5371
Originally posted by basha khan:
Yes .I am.


I think question can be rephrased as

Can there really be anyone who is 100% free of unknown???
R K Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 5371
Originally posted by fred rosenberger:
So, i stand by my statement of SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE.


Occult activties are beyond science thats why they are supernatural.

And I think occult belongs to no religion.
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender

Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 11479
    
  16

Shankar,

Have your friend apply at the JREF. Dowsers have been repeated tested and retested. NONE have EVER done statistically better than chance. if your friend can do what he claims, he will be $1million richer.

R.K.,

like Ernest said, science CAN measure things. the JREF doesn't care HOW it's done. They have NO interest in that aspect of the ability. In fact, applications are often rejected because of long, rambling essays of people trying to tell HOW this stuff works.

the JREF doesn't care. They just want to SEE it done, under mutually agreed upon protocols that meet all scientific criteria - double blind tests, baseline tests, etc. And have it be repeatable.

I am not arguing people WANT to believe, or that they DO believe in such things. The mind is VERY strong in persuading itself of things it WANTS to believe.

EVERY person who claims to have an ability who has been subjected to formal testing has shown that the ability wasn't there, on that day. They always come back with "the moon wasn't right" or "the subjects all spoke German" or "my Qi wasn't properly focused". Or my personal favorite, "I'm never wrong, so science must be".

The burden of proof lies with the person who is making such fantastic claims.
Roger Nelson
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: 95
Yesterday, I opened my IE browser and along with it everytime the windows calculator pops up on the browser.
I tried cleaning the browser cache using anti-spyware, rebooted my windows box several times, but still always found the calculator popping up every single time. Did a google search on "IE + calculator ..." and did not get any relevant results.
So finally concluded that if google can't find it, it should be a ghost who does that. :-).
Today started the browser and "hurray" no calculator, so confirmed that it was the "Microsoft windows Ghost"( Hope to get $1million from JREF :-) )
shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
But science could measure it.

Dinosaurs were wiped out because their numbers increased to a massive proportion unable to handle by the planet!!! Some other species may have existed even before dinosaurs and were wiped out beacause of the same reason.
Human race will also meet its end in a similar fashion , because of the increasing burden it is causing on the planet.
All these are nature's ways of protecting itself from external influences causing atrocities on it and is controlled by a power greater than physics, chemistry or Maths can explain .
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: shankar Iyer ]
basha khan
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: 516
Originally posted by R K Singh:


I think question can be rephrased as

Can there really be anyone who is 100% free of unknown???


But unknown cannot be a ghost. Can be. But no proof. No way to fear.
[ October 21, 2005: Message edited by: basha khan ]
Dave Lenton
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 1241
Originally posted by shankar Iyer:
Dinosaurs were wiped out because their numbers increased to a massive proportion unable to handle by the planet!!!

We don't actually know why the dinosaurs got wiped out. We don't even know if they did (some people think a portion are still around in the form of crocodiles, birds etc). The best theory we have is that a lot of them became extinct. There are several theories as to how this is likely to have happened, and the two most likely appear to be some kind of external astronomical incident (asteroid, solar activity etc) or a change in the climate. I personally haven't seen any scientists support the theory that overpopulation wiped them out, but I guess its possible. Its just not, in my most humble of opinions, the most likely scenario.
Some other species may have existed even before dinosaurs and were wiped out beacause of the same reason.

Possibly. Some species do suffer from over population, but I would guess that the vast majority of extinction events have other factors contributing significantly to them, commonly environmental changes. Often global warming/cooling or changing gas make up of the atmosphere are put forwards as likely theories.

Human race will also meet its end in a similar fashion , because of the increasing burden it is causing on the planet.
All these are nature's ways of protecting itself from external influences causing atrocities on it and is controlled by a power greater than physics, chemistry or Maths can explain .
[ October 20, 2005: Message edited by: shankar Iyer ]

It need not necessarily be attributed to some "greater power". A common idea in chaos theory is that the more complex a system becomes, the less it takes to change it. Environments are incredibly complex systems, and its not unlikely that they can undergo some fairly dramatic changes given long enough for changes to spread through the system.

We think of our environment as being fairly stable, and because of this consider that changes to it must be very unusual. This view is a bit flawed though because of our consideration of the time scales. The human race has only been around for a very short amount of time in geological terms and already its seem at least one major environmental change (the end of the ice age). If you could fast-forward a view of the earth you would see if continuously changing between hot and cold, and between evenly and unevenly distributed temperature and moisture zones. Its actually quite an actively changing place, so its no surprise that some species can't adapt quick enough and get wiped out.


There will be glitches in my transition from being a saloon bar sage to a world statesman. - Tony Banks
Barry Gaunt
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 03, 2002
Posts: 7729
Where's all the dinosaur ghosts then?
Dave Lenton
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 1241
Originally posted by R K Singh:
Occult activties are beyond science thats why they are supernatural.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this appears to be a view that the universe has two kinds of things in it - "scientific" stuff which scientists can understand, and "supernatural" stuff which science cannot explain.

Science isn't a class of stuff though, but a technique of measuring things.

There are a great many theories of things which exist. Some people like to see some kind of measured indication of an object's existence before they hold it likely that the object exists. Those that use scientific methods to measure the indication of the objects existence are scientists. They hold it to be a fallacy to declare that an object exists if there are not any reasonable indications to support that view.

There are other people who hold things to be true without using any measurements of proof. This act of holding something to be true without any measured indication existence is not scientific. Often however these people wish to justify their belief in the object to scientists, and declare it to be in a special subset of reality which cannot be proven and is therefore exempt from the scientific method. Could declaring an object as being "supernatural" be a way of trying to avoid scientific scrutiny of the theory?

Is it right or wrong to hold something to be true without reasonable indications of its existence? My own personal view is that it is a fallacy to do so, but at the same time everyone has a right to do so. Just don't expect any people who follow scientific methods to accept that the term "supernatural" or the phrase "my mate told me its true" can be sufficient reason to accept that its likely to exist
Sripathi Krishnamurthy
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 232
Supernatural topics are always argueable. But I feel if one agrees that god exists, they shd believe ghost also can exist.
MIND is the best example of what science cant explain. It does not mean mind does not exist.
There are numerous experiments conducted on human brain to see how mind operates, but scientists are not able to get even 1% breakthrough.
Why and How does one dream?
Why does 2 kids who may be brothers/sisters have completely differently attitudes? even though they are in a controlled environment.
It boils down to perception. And why do each person percieve a single thing differently.
If science cant explain these, that means science has its limitations.
So if science cant explain ghosts, that does not really mean ghosts cant exist.
Donald R. Cossitt
buckaroo
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 31, 2003
Posts: 401

Dowsers have been repeated tested and retested. NONE have EVER done statistically better than chance. if your friend can do what he claims, he will be $1million richer.


Perhaps you should speak of something you have practical experience with and not just heard second hand. There would not be a water well Eastern Oregon and likely, not a well, that was not 'witched' or 'dowsed'. I have done it myself many times (I am 70 for 72).


But then I guess a 97.2% success rate could be just luck - rather be lucky than good.

But I think the real point of this thread is: I have yet heard or seen of even a 'lucky break' produce hard evidence of a ghost (or Sasquatch or UFO or...) A lucky guess at water that eventually produces 7 GPM is hard to deny - especially in eastern Oregon.
[ October 21, 2005: Message edited by: Donald R. Cossitt ]

doco
Dave Lenton
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 20, 2005
Posts: 1241
Originally posted by Sripathi Krishnamurthy:
Supernatural topics are always argueable. But I feel if one agrees that god exists, they shd believe ghost also can exist.

Why? Isn't that like saying "I choose to believe X, therefore Y is also true"? Even if we are making an assumtion about X, I cannot see what leads to the premise X->Y.

If science cant explain these, that means science has its limitations.

Absolutely. Science isn't yet able to explain or measure an awful lot of things, but it doesn't mean that its completely useless. Its still a good tool for trying to understand the universe.... but...

So if science cant explain ghosts, that does not really mean ghosts cant exist.

... but it doesn't mean that those things it can't explain are given extra credibility because there are some other things it can't explain. True, we can't disprove ghosts, but neither can we prove them. At best we can give a noncommittal answer. Further evidence and scientific understanding of the universe could also justify a sceptical stance towards them.

Without proof either way, a definitive statement as to the existence or non-existence of ghosts is a fallacy.
fred rosenberger
lowercase baba
Bartender

Joined: Oct 02, 2003
Posts: 11479
    
  16

Donald,

Why don't you go ahead and apply for the challenge? I'm sure you could use $1 million, yes? the JREF probably wouldn't even require you to have a 97% success rate. i'd bet that even a 50% success rate would be fine, if the odds were 1-in-10. And forgive me for not taking your word as evidence of success.

if one agrees that god exists, they shd believe ghost also can exist.

but we DON'T agree that God exists. There is not even a consensus among believers in WHICH God exists... or if there is even exactly one.

Now, the OP wondered if "there really be anyone who is 100% free of ghost fears". i would say "Yes. Me. There is no evidence that ghosts exist, so i am not afraid of them."
shan Iyer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 13, 2005
Posts: 391
but we DON'T agree that God exists

Hey,
Why doesent the JREF also prove something to us!!!
Why dont u disprove the existance of God??

--Shankar--
Devesh H Rao
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 09, 2002
Posts: 687

Originally posted by shankar Iyer:

Hey,
Why doesent the JREF also prove something to us!!!
Why dont u disprove the existance of God??

--Shankar--


Given the qualities we bestow on god, it wouldn�t be too difficult to prove the non-existence of god as the absence of a particular quality is taken to be as its non-existence.
I think JREF has more to do with supporting rational beliefs and fighting superstition [Fred please correct me if I am wrong, as my assumption is based on what I have read in this post.]

But all said and done, the above line of thought does have the limitation that it follows on the premise that humans know everything that exists at any given point in time.
Even in basic set theory there is A and !A, where A is the set of probable events and !A is the set of all event which falls outside the boundaries of the particular equation, so when we say something doesn�t exist does it mean we are saying !A is a null set and humans know everything at the point in time.

Not questioning anyone's right of not being afraid of the unknown, it really is difficult to work up a fear about something which one has not encountered in the first place but to deny existence about things we don�t know seems kind off too arrogant about the knowledge we possess.

I am not afraid of ghosts, but I do not question anyone who believes in its existence. Maybe the person knows more than me or the person was dumb enough to be duped by a white curtain floating around in his neighbor�s balcony.

Can existence of vacuum be proved by science? Yet it is the relative environment in which most of the experiments are supposed to be carried out in.
R K Singh
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 15, 2001
Posts: 5371
Originally posted by Dave Lenton:
Just don't expect any people who follow scientific methods to accept that the term "supernatural" or the phrase "my mate told me its true" can be sufficient reason to accept that its likely to exist


Do you believe in Black holes.

Did you say yes ??

Why ?? Because some of your scientist author told you thats why you are believing in him.

Its not proved that balck hole exist ??
From time to time you may heard of white dwarf is found or black hole has been found in so and so galaxy but nothing is sure, even who are saying that its black hole they also are just guessing.


What I am trying to say that, if there are things which can be measured and proved by science, then there are things that can not be measured and proved by science, and that is supernatural.

Supernatural is not related to ghost or God.
It is related to unexplanied phenomenon.

You may find instances in science also where they cant measured things and they come up with anew word, say iota or black hole.

Ahh... BTW black hole is suppose to be area where all laws of physics supoose to not work.

Black hole cant be measured.

For me black hole if exist is supernatural.

Having said that, I am not talking about miracles, or walking on water.
I am talking about supernatural things that happens in day to day life.

I have yet to meet a person who has not experienced Deja-vu.
I have yet to meet a person who has not got up in night for no reason.

Just look around yourself and you would find that this world is full of supernatural things that science can not explain.

Oh no .... I am not talkign about ghosts and Gods. I am just simply talkign about supernatural things which can not be explained by science.

Why only when woman is pregnant she gets milk in her breast.
Can evalution theory tell me what is the need of two genders in animal ?

A theory itself is imaginary thing and followed till it is proved wrong.

And when theory is strong enough then one instance becomes exception (though in theory that theory should not remain theory once proved wrong.)

OR we may agree that some people belive in one imaginary baseless things and other believe other imaginary baseless things.
And for both of them world works fine.

Atom bomb do exist and earthquakes too.
Devesh H Rao
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 09, 2002
Posts: 687

Originally posted by Barry Gaunt:
Where's all the dinosaur ghosts then?


The excavation work is going on to trace them and its progress is published in the Ghostly edition of National geographic.

I couldn�t subscribe, due to me not meeting the registration criteria for being an adult ghost i.e. dead for more than 18 years, but I will try to get my hands on the same in the spooky market and update you about them.

Devesh H Rao
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 09, 2002
Posts: 687

Taking inspiration from this thread I tried the line "Absence of proof means the non-existence" on a non-reproducable bug I have been trying to track in our application.

QC reopened the bug with the comment to carry out more test scenarioes.

Sripathi Krishnamurthy
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 232
Originally posted by Dave Lenton:

Without proof either way, a definitive statement as to the existence or non-existence of ghosts is a fallacy.


So if someone asks "does ghost exists"? will you say I dont know whether they exist or does not exist?
Sripathi Krishnamurthy
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 232
Originally posted by shankar Iyer:

Hey,
Why doesent the JREF also prove something to us!!!
Why dont u disprove the existance of God??

--Shankar--


Yes, you can keep one million prize money and ask them to disprove god/ghosts exists or does exist. They will be more than willing to accept your challenge
Sripathi Krishnamurthy
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 232
Originally posted by Devesh H Rao:


Can existence of vacuum be proved by science? Yet it is the relative environment in which most of the experiments are supposed to be carried out in.


Vacuum means nothing exists. We cant say "existence of Vacuum". The absence of matter is called vacuum.
Devesh H Rao
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 09, 2002
Posts: 687

Originally posted by Sripathi Krishnamurthy:


Vacuum means nothing exists. We cant say "existence of Vacuum". The absence of matter is called vacuum.


ok, will it make a difference to the point I am trying to make if I reword it as "Can science prove existence of absence of matter?"

I was reading another thread on MD where there was a quote which said how many legs will a dog have if we call its tail a leg, the answer is the dog will still have 4 legs.

There was a theory on world being flat in ancient times, does that mean the world was flat then, no the world was round even back then.

We do not know what is infinite, we define it in relation to what is known but does that mean infinite exists?

Any scientific theory is governed by our limitation of knowledge, it is more about what we do not know and would like to know, than what we know and are happy with that.
 
wood burning stoves
 
subject: Frightened of ghosts ???