| Author |
HFSJ page 336(Q-6) Errata?
|
Vijitha Kumara
Bartender
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: 3670
|
|
It's the first edition of the book and this is related with one of my previous replies here Question says:
Given: <%@ page isELIgnored="true" %> What is the effect?
Given answer is(E): This page declaration will only turn off EL evaluation if the DD declares a <el-ignored>true<el-ignored> element with a URL pattern that includes this JSP. Answer D says: The JSP containing this directive should NOT have any Expression Language code evaluated by the JSP Container. Isn't the option D is correct? Your suggestions?
|
SCJP 5 | SCWCD 5
[How to ask questions] [Twitter]
|
 |
Christian Nicoll
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 09, 2008
Posts: 106
|
|
Hi Vijitha, i don't know the content of the first version of HFSJ, but I am sure that answer D is correct. I think that answer E is false. On the second version of HFSJ on page 322 is a small Watch-Out-Note with the title "The page directive takes priority over the DD setting!". I think this says all. Addendum: The same question is also posted on the second version of HFSJ and the answer is there only D. [ December 29, 2008: Message edited by: Christian Nicoll ]
|
SCJP 5, SCJD 5, SCWCD 5, SCBCD 5, SCJDWS 5
My SCBCD-Notes - My Hello World Webservice
|
 |
Vijitha Kumara
Bartender
Joined: Mar 24, 2008
Posts: 3670
|
|
Addendum: The same question is also posted on the second version of HFSJ and the answer is there only D.
Thanks Christian, then no problem.
|
 |
 |
I agree. Here's the link: jrebel
|
|
subject: HFSJ page 336(Q-6) Errata?
|
|
|