This week's book giveaway is in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum. We're giving away four copies of Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt and have Girish Suryanarayana, Ganesh Samarthyam & Tushar Sharma on-line! See this thread for details.
Im looking for a new TV and have choosen to buy a 26" LCD. Im thinking about "investing" around 1000-1300$. While browsing the net I found this (in my eyes) nice looking LCD TV which also is very cheap (ca 1050 $):
I noticed, that it's resolution was 960 x 540. This isn't much compared to other brands in the same price class (Phillips, Samsung ect) which has a resolution of 1366 x 768. According to Sharps website, the TV should be HD Compatible.
Can anyone tell me what this "means" to the quality ?
There arn't any Sharp retailers here in Denmark afaik so I can't see the TV IRL. According to a webshop selling the Sharp TV:
"AQUOS P-serie is a breakthrough withing TV. ... The secret behinds these models is the unique PAL-panel. ... This eliminates the need for signal- compression." (translated from danish -> english) edit: more
Thanks in advance,
[ March 08, 2006: Message edited by: Svend Rost ]
edit: Modified the title [ March 09, 2006: Message edited by: Svend Rost ]
HD stands for High Definition. The regular channels are broadcasted in a 4:3 aspect ratio format whereas HD is transmitted in 16:9 format. That means higher resolution and exceptional picture quality. The only way you can actually experience the picture quality of HD is if there are Stations broadcasting channels in HD. There are already HD channels in the US like Fox etc.
Only a TV with HD compatibility can receive HD broadcast and not regular 4:3 TVs.
I have a Philips 42" plasma at home and I am very happy with the picture quality.
I think Panasonic Plasma TV are the best in the class or atleast have the highest Consumer ratings in the HDTV class. But Sharp Aquos is equally good, but they are expensive.
I used their sister site the www.projectorpeople.com when I purchased my lcd front projector, a Sanyo PLV-Z2, last summer. They provided a lot of information on the different specs and how they effect picture quality.
Joined: Oct 23, 2002
Thanks for the feedback. I think my initial "title" was a bit misleading...
Thanks for the links Bob - sadly they didn't have any specs for my LCD TV I am thinking about buying. I think the SHARP AQUOS LC-26P50E is only available in europe..
My problem is, that I dont know what a "low" resolution does to the quality of the TV. As mentioned before, the Sharp 26" TV has a resolution of 960 x 540 whereas other TV's in it's class has 1366 x 768.
Is this a problem (note: The sharp should be HD compatible which as I understand it means, that it has the avail. to show high quality TV)?
Joined: Jun 01, 2000
According to the sites I mentioned, TVs with a resolution of 960 x 540 are considered 1/4 HD. You might need a resolution of at least 1024 X 768 to get a true HDTV picture.
@ Bob: Thanks for the information. I didn't see that on the site. I emailed a webshops service center yesterday, and their reply to my question concerning the Sharp and quality was, that they would recommend another TV instead (a Samsung model - it costs 500$ more though)
@ Kishore: I think a projector with accessories is more expensive than a 26" LCD TV.. I dont need a big cinema system (i.e. I dont want to pay 5000$ for it). All I need is a 26" black TV for watching the news, a serie and the occasional movie.