| Author |
Which to keep JRE for Web Application : JRE\bin\server\jvm.dll or JRE\bin\client\jvm.dll
|
amol l a lekurwale
Ranch Hand
Joined: Oct 16, 2008
Posts: 30
|
|
|
I am developing a Web based application. For that, I dont want to distribute the entire JDK, but only that 'much', as it is required for deployment, and execution. For that, I plan to keep all the needed files (like server\jvm.dll from JDK's JRE copied to Program Files JRE\bin\server\jvm.dll). Please suggest me a solution to do so. Also, if in case, I dont have any option other than keeping the JDK as it is, can I delete the JDK\jre, and force the application to use Program Files JRE, by adding the server\jvm.dll, as stated above?
|
 |
Nitesh Kant
Bartender
Joined: Feb 25, 2007
Posts: 1638
|
|
This is strange. You are writing a web application, so obviously, it will be deployed on a web/app server.
The web/app server will anyways use a JDK specified by the user. A web application can not run in it's own JDK!
|
apigee, a better way to API!
|
 |
Vivek Kr Singh
Ranch Hand
Joined: Oct 12, 2007
Posts: 56
|
|
|
All application servers depend on jvm.dll to be locally installed on the client machine. For any web application going on application severs there will always be a JRE installation. BEA ( Oracle) Weblogic Server for example comes with a custom JVM called jRockit. Developers are encouraged to work in jRockit in development mode.
|
SCJP 1.4
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Which to keep JRE for Web Application : JRE\bin\server\jvm.dll or JRE\bin\client\jvm.dll
|
|
|