my dog learned polymorphism*
The moose likes Blatant Advertising and the fly likes Agile In a Flash: Why POUT (aka TAD) Sucks Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Other » Blatant Advertising
Bookmark "Agile In a Flash: Why POUT (aka TAD) Sucks" Watch "Agile In a Flash: Why POUT (aka TAD) Sucks" New topic
Author

Agile In a Flash: Why POUT (aka TAD) Sucks

Jeff Langr
author
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 14, 2003
Posts: 762
TAD = test-after development (in contrast to TDD, test-driven development)
POUT = plain-old unit testing

http://agileinaflash.blogspot.com/2009/02/why-pout-aka-tad-sucks.html


Books: Agile Java, Modern C++ Programming with TDD, Essential Java Style, Agile in a Flash. Contributor, Clean Code.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Agile In a Flash: Why POUT (aka TAD) Sucks
 
Similar Threads
Object has instance variables encapsulated by access methods...
Installing multiple Tomcat versions
Why don't write array of characters in a BufferedOutputStream using Piped?
This Weeks GiveAway:
How to motivate team for Unit testing