# Prisoner's doubt

agrah upadhyay

Ranch Hand

Posts: 579

posted 9 years ago

A prisoner is going to be hanged in one of the next 7 days-Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday,Saturday and Sunday.And jailor has said him that

Now he thiks let him calculate probability of each day for me to get hanged.

He starts with Sunday.He thinks that he will be hanged on Sunday ONLY when he is spared on Monday,spared also on Tuesday,also on Wednesday,Thursday,Friday and also on Saturday.Now if he is spared ALSO on Saturday then on Saturday ITSELF,he will come to KNOW that he is gonna be hanged on Sunday means he has known the day of hanging

So he thinks that he has JUST 6 days of hanging option-Monday yo Saturday!Now he starts calculating probability of Saturday.Hethinks that he will be hanged on Saturday ONLY when he spares from Monday to Friday but if he spares EVEN on Friday then he will come to know IN ADVANCE that he is gonna be hanged on Saturday(Because Sunday is IMPOSSIBLE ) for him to hang.But he thinks that jailor has quoted that he will not be known the day of his hanging in advance.SO,Saturday is also impossible for him to hang on.So now he ias left with only 5 possible options of hanging-Monday to Friday.

Now when he backtraces other possible days,he finds that THERE IS NO POSSIBLE DAY WHEN HIS HANGING WILL TAKE PLACE.

BUT on one fine day,he was taken for hanging and was hanged.SO WHAT IS FLAW IN

*he will not be certain of EXACT day on which he is gonna be hanged.Means like on any day,he cant say that he is gonna be hanged on this specific day.*Now he thiks let him calculate probability of each day for me to get hanged.

He starts with Sunday.He thinks that he will be hanged on Sunday ONLY when he is spared on Monday,spared also on Tuesday,also on Wednesday,Thursday,Friday and also on Saturday.Now if he is spared ALSO on Saturday then on Saturday ITSELF,he will come to KNOW that he is gonna be hanged on Sunday means he has known the day of hanging

*in advance*but it violates jailor's saying.SO HE CAN NOT BE HANGED ON SUNDAY means probability of his hanging on Sunday is 0 means it is IMPOSSIBLE his hanging on Sunday.So he thinks that he has JUST 6 days of hanging option-Monday yo Saturday!Now he starts calculating probability of Saturday.Hethinks that he will be hanged on Saturday ONLY when he spares from Monday to Friday but if he spares EVEN on Friday then he will come to know IN ADVANCE that he is gonna be hanged on Saturday(Because Sunday is IMPOSSIBLE ) for him to hang.But he thinks that jailor has quoted that he will not be known the day of his hanging in advance.SO,Saturday is also impossible for him to hang on.So now he ias left with only 5 possible options of hanging-Monday to Friday.

Now when he backtraces other possible days,he finds that THERE IS NO POSSIBLE DAY WHEN HIS HANGING WILL TAKE PLACE.

BUT on one fine day,he was taken for hanging and was hanged.SO WHAT IS FLAW IN

*HIS*thinking?**PS:I have tried to explain problem in full detail**
Dinesh Bang

Ranch Hand

Posts: 52

posted 9 years ago

The prisoner is moving ahead on the time scale,n making his hanging probability decisions accordingly . This is the flaw in his thinking.

We can compare it with the suitation of of getting a particular, say red heart "A" in the set of 52 cards. The probablity here of getting it would be 1/52.

Now if we say we take away any card , not the read heart "A" and now calculate the probablity of getting it, it comes out to be 1/51...n we go on like this with increasing probablity of getting the red heart A.

But here too we are moving along with the time scale of eliminating...the cards.

The same is the case with prisoner , wherein he is eliminating the days, by moving along with the time scale, n hence at end is left with just on day...n feels like he has betrayed death..

We can compare it with the suitation of of getting a particular, say red heart "A" in the set of 52 cards. The probablity here of getting it would be 1/52.

Now if we say we take away any card , not the read heart "A" and now calculate the probablity of getting it, it comes out to be 1/51...n we go on like this with increasing probablity of getting the red heart A.

But here too we are moving along with the time scale of eliminating...the cards.

The same is the case with prisoner , wherein he is eliminating the days, by moving along with the time scale, n hence at end is left with just on day...n feels like he has betrayed death..

SCJP 1.4,SCBCD 1.3, SCWCD 1.5, ???

agrah upadhyay

Ranch Hand

Posts: 579

posted 9 years ago

By moving along with time scale?

What are chances for of any day for example of Sunday?Only when he fets spared from Monday to Saturday na?So He is just calculating chances for him of hanging.............

**The same is the case with prisoner , wherein he is eliminating the days, by moving along with the time scale, n hence at end is left with just on day**

By moving along with time scale?

What are chances for of any day for example of Sunday?Only when he fets spared from Monday to Saturday na?So He is just calculating chances for him of hanging.............

agrah upadhyay

Ranch Hand

Posts: 579

agrah upadhyay

Ranch Hand

Posts: 579

Aj Mathia

Ranch Hand

Posts: 478

posted 9 years ago

In my opinion,

all his assumptions are right on reverse conditional probability.

but on a forward conditional probability there is no way he can assume a situation unless the has faced it.

so for example on a friday he can assume sunday as a clear day but thats on the assumption that he has faced saturday.

Similarly

on friday he has to die and on saturday he has to die too and the same on any other day, but he can die only on one day which contradicts his assumptions.

what do you think?

A meaningless answer would be he was killed at night.

Another would be he was taken out at around midnight to be hung,

he is now certain that he will be hung but was actually hung the next day on the stroke of midnight.

and for the mother of em all he was killed yesterday.

all his assumptions are right on reverse conditional probability.

but on a forward conditional probability there is no way he can assume a situation unless the has faced it.

so for example on a friday he can assume sunday as a clear day but thats on the assumption that he has faced saturday.

Similarly

on friday he has to die and on saturday he has to die too and the same on any other day, but he can die only on one day which contradicts his assumptions.

what do you think?

A meaningless answer would be he was killed at night.

Another would be he was taken out at around midnight to be hung,

he is now certain that he will be hung but was actually hung the next day on the stroke of midnight.

and for the mother of em all he was killed yesterday.

*You think you know me .... You will never know me ... You know only what I let you know ... You are just a puppet ...* --CMG

agrah upadhyay

Ranch Hand

Posts: 579

R K Singh

Ranch Hand

Posts: 5384

posted 9 years ago

He is getting hanged and you are smiling ..

AW the flaw in prisoner's logic was that he applied only probability, but not permutation and combination.

When he zeroed out Sunday and while zeroing out Saturday he forgot that on Friday , still he may be hanged on Sunday. And samething is true for others day also.

On Tuesday, he may be hanged on Wed/Thu/Fri/Sat/Sun. (he could not be sured)

If he would have applied P & C then he would have got so many choices that he would have died on first day before he was hanged

Originally posted by agrah upadhyay:

BUT on one fine day,he was taken for hanging and was hanged.SO WHAT IS FLAW INHISthinking?

He is getting hanged and you are smiling ..

AW the flaw in prisoner's logic was that he applied only probability, but not permutation and combination.

When he zeroed out Sunday and while zeroing out Saturday he forgot that on Friday , still he may be hanged on Sunday. And samething is true for others day also.

On Tuesday, he may be hanged on Wed/Thu/Fri/Sat/Sun. (he could not be sured)

If he would have applied P & C then he would have got so many choices that he would have died on first day before he was hanged

"Thanks to Indian media who has over the period of time swiped out intellectual taste from mass Indian population." - Chetan Parekh

Chetan Parekh

Ranch Hand

Posts: 3640

Ulf Dittmer

Rancher

Posts: 42967

73

Steve McClintic

Greenhorn

Posts: 14

Jeroen T Wenting

Ranch Hand

Posts: 1847

posted 9 years ago

As long as he's not hanged, he's very much alive and may remain so for an indeterminate interval.

As such he's no different from anyone else (he know he'll die at some point but doesn't know when) and therefore can be made fun of.

Him being a convicted criminal furthermore means he has no right to not be made fun of

Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:

Stop this dicussion.One should not make fun out of a dieing person.

As long as he's not hanged, he's very much alive and may remain so for an indeterminate interval.

As such he's no different from anyone else (he know he'll die at some point but doesn't know when) and therefore can be made fun of.

Him being a convicted criminal furthermore means he has no right to not be made fun of

42

posted 9 years ago

1.he will not be certain of EXACT day on which he is gonna be hanged.Means like on any day,he cant say that he is gonna be hanged on this specific day.

Now he thiks let him calculate probability of each day for me to get hanged.

2.He starts with Sunday

The two statements are contradictory in nature, for the second statement to hold true the first needs to be not valid, and if we take the first statement to hold true there is no way the prisoner can start counting from Sunday which happens to be the last day and has dependencies of probability of him being hung on any previous day being not known which is not the case if the second statement is true in totality

In either case both the statements cannot be true at the same time hence any results borne out of using the two as base will not be valid.

The assumption made by the problem is again another fallacy on lines of 2=3 problem. A result just cannot be based on untrue statements.

PS: The assumption being if a person is not sure of the �EXACT� day of his hanging, he is not sure of his �EXACT� day of not hanging as well.

Now he thiks let him calculate probability of each day for me to get hanged.

2.He starts with Sunday

The two statements are contradictory in nature, for the second statement to hold true the first needs to be not valid, and if we take the first statement to hold true there is no way the prisoner can start counting from Sunday which happens to be the last day and has dependencies of probability of him being hung on any previous day being not known which is not the case if the second statement is true in totality

In either case both the statements cannot be true at the same time hence any results borne out of using the two as base will not be valid.

The assumption made by the problem is again another fallacy on lines of 2=3 problem. A result just cannot be based on untrue statements.

PS: The assumption being if a person is not sure of the �EXACT� day of his hanging, he is not sure of his �EXACT� day of not hanging as well.

posted 9 years ago

coz the person does not know when he is going to be hung, he can be made fun of on the days when he will be not hung...

so lets see... start from sunday... can I make fun of him today... so on and so forth...

Originally posted by Chetan Parekh:

Stop this dicussion.One should not make fun out of a dieing person.

coz the person does not know when he is going to be hung, he can be made fun of on the days when he will be not hung...

so lets see... start from sunday... can I make fun of him today... so on and so forth...