This week's book giveaway is in the Agile and other Processes forum. We're giving away four copies of The Mikado Method and have Ola Ellnestam and Daniel Brolund on-line! See this thread for details.
Originally posted by marc weber: I don't understand why you seem so intent on "winning" an argument, but you might take a look at this page on fallacy.
I haven't read entire article, but I'm agree with following sentance that i read.
"Your argument is wrong because you work for MicroSoft!"
I agree with it and will use it at appropriate situation.
I prefer large reasonably heavy hardcover books in an argument. They pack a good punch and are easy to swing both horizontally and vertically.
Something like an atlas or the handbook of chemistry and physics for example are great for settling arguments. Paperback novels are far less effective, but in an emergency can be used to deflect other peoples' arguments.
42
Jim Yingst
Wanderer
Sheriff
Joined: Jan 30, 2000
Posts: 18670
posted
0
[Jeroen]: Something like an atlas or the handbook of chemistry and physics for example are great for settling arguments.
Yeah, the CRC Handbook is pretty authoritative, isn't it?
[Jeroen]: Paperback novels are far less effective, but in an emergency can be used to deflect other peoples' arguments.
They're also easier to lug around, and are much more maneuverable if your opponent is attempting to dodge or deflect. And the spine can deliver a surprising solid blow to the skull - not to be underestimated. Also can be concealable, especially in colder weather under a coat or jacket.
"I'm not back." - Bill Harding, Twister
Robbi Palacios
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 25, 2006
Posts: 92
posted
0
Originally posted by Deepak Mahboobani: Any pointers to books on topics such as:
1. How to win an argument 2. How to have things your way 3. How to be diplomatic 4. How to use jargons in "management talks"
I can think one of though I haven't read it: Don't say Yes when you want to say No
I was thinking this way before whenever i lose a debate with my boss over a new requirement. Later, when I checked his background I found out he was a VP before so this guy must have lots of training of how to be a jackass. So, I guess bosses are good examples to observe.
Originally posted by Robbi Palacios: ...this guy must have lots of training of how to be a jackass. So, I guess bosses are good examples to observe.
If being a (bigger) jackass is the key, then I would question the definition of "winning."
Robbi Palacios
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 25, 2006
Posts: 92
posted
0
Hahaha , i guess someday I'll be a better jackass than my boss.
Deepak Mahboobani
Greenhorn
Joined: Aug 17, 2006
Posts: 11
posted
0
Originally posted by marc weber: I don't understand why you seem so intent on "winning" an argument, but you might take a look at this page on fallacy.
The inten is not on "winning", but on being able to sustain in an argument.
Ok let me put it this way, - How to argue with your boss? Any one?
Svend Rost
Ranch Hand
Joined: Oct 23, 2002
Posts: 904
posted
0
Originally posted by Deepak Mahboobani: Ok let me put it this way, - How to argue with your boss? Any one?
0
, i guess someday I'll be a better jackass than 
